My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
pf09-032
Roseville
>
Planning Files
>
2009
>
pf09-032
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/29/2014 1:56:49 PM
Creation date
6/24/2013 4:01:38 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Planning Files
Planning Files - Planning File #
09-032
Planning Files - Type
Conditional Use Permit
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
161
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
�.0 a:�ch�:K<���.�u <br />:' S.1 City of Roseville owns the property at 286 County Road C, which has a Comprehensive <br />'? Plan designation of Park & Open Space (POS) and an identical zoning classification of <br />�-3 Park & Open Space (POS). <br />�' S.2 This CotvD��r�oNAL USE request has been prompted by the applicant's desire to erect the <br />�� tower, convey it to the City, and lease space for their telecommunication equipment on <br />`�� and at the base of the tower, which makes the City a partner in the application in addition <br />�- to being the landowner. <br />��:� 6.0 STAFF ComMENTs <br />'�� 6.1 Although Roseville City staff has continued to work with Clearwire's application for <br />'� approval of a telecommunication tower facility as a CONDITIONAL USE in Acorn Park, <br />! conflicts persist between the policies that guide the activities and recommendations of <br />G�' various City Departments. As a specific example, the Parks and Recreation Department is <br />4;> responsible for maintaining a high quality experience for park users and believes that a <br />�= telecommunication facility suitable for multiple service providers is inappropriate in <br />i� Acorn Park, whereas Community Development staff believes that the proposed facility is <br />�t% consistent with the guidance of the Comprehensive Plan and the requirements of the <br />4� zoning code and, therefore, ought to be approved. <br />t:; 6.2 This impasse appears to be a result of the absence of a City policy for the siting of <br />!_� telecommunications towers. Without a general City policy for determining when or <br />�', whether Roseville, as a property owner, is interested in locating telecommunication <br />>' infrastructure on City-owned property, the City is unable to answer this question as it <br />��<' applies specifically to Acorn Park. <br />6.3 Given the City's inability to act on the specific land use request in the face of lingering <br />uncertainty on the broader policy question, City staff has asked whether Clearwire is <br />willing to withdraw the application since withdrawal would provide an opporiunity to <br />resolve the policy issue without the pressure of the land use application. Clearwire was <br />not interested in withdrawing, and this is the last City Council meeting prior to the <br />deadline for final action on the application. <br />��) %.O RECOMMENDATION <br />The City Attorney iecomrnends denial of coNDITIONAL USE proposal, based on the <br />following findings: <br />'% a. as the co-applicant and property owner in the proposal, the City of Roseville does <br />not support the application at this time; and <br />- b. the City of Roseville lacks a policy that adequately addresses the location of <br />_., telecommunication inftastructure on City-owned properties to minimize negative <br />impacts with respect to the standard conditional use review criteria. <br />PF09-032 RCA 032910 (3).doc <br />Page 2 of 3 � � <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.