My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
pf09-032
Roseville
>
Planning Files
>
2009
>
pf09-032
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/29/2014 1:56:49 PM
Creation date
6/24/2013 4:01:38 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Planning Files
Planning Files - Planning File #
09-032
Planning Files - Type
Conditional Use Permit
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
161
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
�' 3'- g.� <br />"35 <br />,86 <br />PUBLIC HEARING <br />The duly noticed public hearing for the cotvD�T[oNa,L tisE application was concluded by <br />the Planning Commission on January 6, 2010. <br />�� 8.1 Several members of the public addressed the Planning Commission during the public <br />3� hearing. All of the residents who spoke live near Acorn Park and most of them were <br />° 3� opposed to the tower; the primary concern appeared to be aesthetic, but some were also <br />�c apprehensive about the facility interfering with park activities. One resident spoke in <br />' 3 � favor of the proposal because the tower would tend to be overlooked over time but the <br />��2 amenity of increased wireless services would remain. <br />�i y3 8.2 Individual members of the Planning Commission had definite opinions, but there was <br />� 9a more ambivalence in the body as a whole. For the most part, 1�4embers were sensitive to <br />?�5 the visual impacts of the proposed monopole structure and they were reluctant to <br />'�n recommend approving such a facility before the Parks Master Planning effort had yielded <br />�� �� its conclusions for this park. <br />':�3 8.3 Despite their objections, Commissioners seemed to recognize the value of the services <br />��� provided by the sort of facility being discussed, and most of the discussion revolved <br />20o around relocating the tower to someplace where the impacts might be diminished. Some <br />20� locations suggested by the Commission included the commercial properties in the <br />202 southwest corner of Rice Street and County Road C, or in the easternmost finger of Acorn <br />203 Park adjacent to Rice Street; these locations were viewed as being no more visually <br />2oa obtrusive and more out-of-the-way with respect to the park. In addition to being <br />zo5 significantly closer to individual residences in one of these suggested locations, Planning <br />2os Division staff is given to understand that these locations are not apt substitutes for the <br />20� proposed location in terms of the intent of providing the wireless service coverage. <br />20f3 9.O RECOMMENDATION <br />z�� 9.1 In its review of the CoND[T[otv.a[, usE application, the Planning Commission found that a <br />z�� � telecommunication tower in the proposed location could have adverse impacts on the <br />2�^� public park, which is to be considered with such requests, and consequently voted (4-1) to <br />:� i z recommend denial of the proposed CoND[T[otvAL USE. <br />�� 3 9.2 Based the general consensus of City staff in support of the proposed location of the <br />�' a telecommunication tower indicated in Sections 5-6 of this report and the findings outlined <br />2,5 in Section 7 of this report, the Planning Division continues to recommend approval of the <br />� � n proposed CONDITIONAL USE, subject to the following conditions: <br />2�� a. <br />218 <br />21;� <br />22o b. <br />221 <br />222 c. <br />'>>:3 <br />�2= <br />The applicant shall provide documentation demonstrating that Clearwire's <br />equipment will operate within the technical requirements of the Federal <br />Communications Commission; <br />The tower and ground-mounted equipment shall be located as shown on the site <br />plan included with this report as part of Attachment D; <br />The top of the proposed monopole tower shall not be higher than 125 feet above <br />the grade at the base of the structure and the color of the tower structure shall be <br />selected so as to blend into the park setting as much as possible; <br />PF09-032 RCA 011110 <br />Page 6 of 7 • • <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.