Laserfiche WebLink
� <br />� Attachment B <br />EXTRACT OF MINUTES OF MEETING OF THE <br />CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE <br />� Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of <br />Roseville, County of Ramsey, Minnesota, was held on the 29th day of March 20l 0, at 6:00 p.m. <br />. The following Members were present: <br />and the following Members were absent: <br />Council Member introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: <br />� RESOLUTION NO. <br />A RESOLUTION DENYING A 125-FOOT TELECOMMUNICATION TOWER <br />FACILITY AS A CONDITIONAL USE IN ACCORDANCE WITH §1013.10 AND <br />� §1014.01 OF THE ROSEVILLE CITY CODE FOR CLEARWIRE LLC AND CITY OF <br />�' ROSEVILLE (PF09-032) <br />WHEREAS, City of Roseville owns the property at 286 County Road C; and <br />WHEREAS, the subject property is legally described as: <br />. SECTION 12 TOWN 29 RANGE 23 S 400 FT OF N 930 FT OF E 82 5/10 FT OF W 1309 <br />� 2/10 FT OF NE 1/4 (SUBJ TO RDS AND ESMTS) IN SEC 12 TN 29 RN 23 <br />: PIN: 12-29-23-12-0002 <br />.: WHEREAS, Clearwire LLC in conjunction with the property owner seeks to allow the <br />, construction of a 125-foot telecommunication tower to be owned by City of Roseville, which is a <br />conditionally permitted use in the applicable Park & Open Space Zoning District; and <br />�� WHEREAS, the Roseville City Council has found that: <br />���� 1. as the co-applicant and property owner in the proposal, the City of Roseville does <br />not support the application at this time; and <br />_, 2. the City of Roseville lacks a policy that adequately addresses the location of <br />telecommunication infrastructure on City-owned properties to minimize negative <br />� impacts with respect to the standard conditional use review criteria. <br />�.. NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, by the Roseville City Council, to DENY the <br />:>��: proposed CONDITIONAL USE in accordance with Sections § 1014.01 and § 1013.10 of the <br />< � Roseville City Code. <br /><�� The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Council <br /><<; Member and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor: <br />:�o and voted against; <br />:; � WHEREUPON said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. <br />Page 1 of 2 <br />