Laserfiche WebLink
work through the various drainage issues; and current development of cross plans <br /> to address those issues on various segments of this rural section roadway; and <br /> how to improve water quality/quantity. Ms. Bloom advised that staff would be <br /> meeting again with individual neighbors to address those solutions over the next <br /> few months, at which time the final recommendations would be brought to the <br /> City Council for their input. Ms. Bloom advised that staff s major concern at this <br /> point was in addressing drainage issues. <br /> Discussion included various drainage options available for managing this area; <br /> attempts to mitigate existing issues as well as avoiding designs that would <br /> exacerbate drainage issues; installation of ADA ramps as part of the transition <br /> plan; using the safest route possible for children using that segment; and ongoing <br /> construction meeting information coming forward to the PWETC as it becomes <br /> available. <br /> At the request of Member DeBenedet, Ms. Bloom clarified that the comments <br /> provided tonight included those received in writing from individual property <br /> owners, not verbal comments from the meeting. <br /> Chair Vanderwall noted that this was not just a segment that addressed <br /> neighborhood issues, but was a vital route across the community and major school <br /> route. <br /> 8. Possible Items for Next Meeting—May 28, 2013 <br /> Member Felice advised that she would not be available for the May meeting. <br /> • NPDES Phase II Annual Open Meeting <br /> • LED Lighting Retrofit Plan <br /> • Recycling Contract Draft RFP <br /> • Pathway Build-out? (Gjerdingen) <br /> Ms. Bloom noted that it was up to the PWETC as to the amount of time <br /> preferred at the May meeting, or if they wanted to send comments back to <br /> staff for refinement and discussion at their June meeting. <br /> Chair Vanderwall suggested that, with additional information provided by <br /> staff, a short discussion could ensue at the May meeting in preparation for Ms. <br /> Bloom's attendance at the June meeting. <br /> Member DeBenedet suggested that the first three (3) items sounded like a full <br /> agenda. <br /> Member Stenlund opined that the pathway discussion should not exceed five (5) <br /> minutes. <br /> Chair Vanderwall concurred, that the discussion could be maintained at simply <br /> individual impressions and focus, not a larger discussion, but ensuring that <br /> everyone was on the same page to move forward. <br /> Page 9 of 10 <br />