My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2013-02-26_PWETC_Minutes
Roseville
>
Commissions, Watershed District and HRA
>
Public Works Environment and Transportation Commission
>
Minutes
>
201x
>
2013
>
2013-02-26_PWETC_Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/27/2013 12:03:38 PM
Creation date
6/27/2013 12:03:33 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Commission/Committee
Commission/Authority Name
Public Works Commission
Commission/Committee - Document Type
Minutes
Commission/Committee - Meeting Date
2/26/2013
Commission/Committee - Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
10
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
industry. Mr. Pratt defined the often-used terms "MRF" and "MSW" as <br /> "materials recovery facility" and Municipal Solid Waste" respectively. <br /> Councilmember Willmus arrived in the audience at this time, approximately 6:55 p.m. <br /> Discussion included revenue parity between China and the United States, with <br /> China having significantly lower labor costs and impacts on manufacturer market- <br /> driven issues; cost of and ownership of carts with potential change from a dual to <br /> single-sort systems with no identifiable competitiveness based on provision of <br /> and/or amortization of carts; percentage of participation if and where organic <br /> collections are offered without significant increases in evidence and not <br /> necessarily encouraging a change of vendors by participants based on that factor <br /> alone; collection of organics weekly and differing from summer to winter <br /> seasons; and market forces and trends of manufacturers for potential future <br /> collection of plastic bottles at their point-of-sale. <br /> Further discussion included examples of residential organics that could be <br /> collected (e.g. food scraps; non-recycling papers, such as food boxes with <br /> coatings; tissue and paper towels; dryer lint; vacuum cleaner bags); and the need <br /> for any ongoing research on future program for soiled diaper collection. <br /> As the PWETC began consideration of the community values for the next RFP, <br /> Chair Vanderwall clarified that this should be an initial discussion, with staff then <br /> taking values provided by individual members after tonight's meeting, and <br /> averaged on a spreadsheet for consideration at the next discussion for further <br /> refinement. <br /> Collection Category <br /> Discussion included whether having lids on bins provided any influence on <br /> participation levels and/or volumes collected; efficiencies of lidded bins on <br /> robotically-collected routes; sizes of bins for single-stream collection and impacts <br /> to increased collection; potential increased workers compensation rates for <br /> vendors in addressing size and weight of bins; and the need for continued <br /> education and feedback from haulers on contaminants and in keeping quality <br /> control in place. <br /> Further discussion included ease of communication between vendors and <br /> participants to keep quality of collections up; ease of participation for residents; <br /> ongoing evaluation of participants and collections to eliminate contamination; <br /> single sort versus co-mingling of materials; how to encourage product <br /> stewardship by manufacturers; and the need to alert participants to the broader <br /> range of materials and their types as the markets become available. <br /> Member Felice expressed concern with the term "co-mingling" and what was <br /> intended in previous value discussions. <br /> Page 3 of 10 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.