Laserfiche WebLink
6. Recycling Community Values Discussion Continued <br /> Additional materials had been provided since the agenda packet distribution, and <br /> were provided as a bench handout attached hereto and made a part hereof. <br /> Member Felice also provided, as a bench handout attached hereto and made a <br /> part hereof, her Recycling Community Values rankings. <br /> City of Roseville Recycling Coordinator Tim Pratt, and two audience members <br /> were present for this discussion, a representative of Eureka Recycling and Ms. <br /> Klink. <br /> Chair Vanderwall initiated discussion of individual rankings of community values <br /> by PWETC members, first weighting in the three main categories (Collection, <br /> Outreach, Environmental Benefits) followed by subcategories (Attachment A). <br /> During the following discussions, Mr. Pratt updated individual and composite <br /> weighting values as compromises were made, weighting revised, and a consensus <br /> of Members achieved, with those conclusions attached hereto and made apart <br /> hereof. <br /> Chair Vanderwall, commenting on his rationale in weighting, advised that his <br /> most important goal was facilitate recycling being done and picked up. Chair <br /> Vanderwall opined that if things were picked up and it the program was well-run <br /> and convenient, it would make everything simpler. Chair Vanderwall also noted <br /> his importance in the educational and environmental components. <br /> Member DeBenedet, commenting on his rationale in weighting, advised that the <br /> environmental benefits were one of the main reasons the recycling program was <br /> in place. While also placing significant importance on the outreach category as <br /> well, while some of the subcomponents should be made standard requirements of <br /> the request for proposals (RFP), and not requiring weighted at all, since if you <br /> didn't meet the basic requirements of the RFP, you were not considered a <br /> responsible bidder. <br /> However, Chair Vanderwall suggested some judgment may be required to <br /> determine how, when and if a particular vendor was sincerely attempting to <br /> reduce their carbon footprint. <br /> In the outreach section, Member DeBenedet suggested that effective education of <br /> residents should remain a measurement; however, the annual report an what <br /> happens to materials should be submitted to Mr. Pratt and forwarded to the <br /> PWETC, at which time they could determine if was sufficient or not. Member <br /> DeBenedet referenced the reports being provided by the current vendor as a <br /> standard for future report s/vendors. <br /> Page 5 of 14 <br />