res_9661 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

EXTRACT OF MINUTES OF MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE . . . . . . . . . . .. * * Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Roseville, County of Ramsey, Minnesota, was duly held on the 29th day of June 1999, at 6:30 p.m. The following members were present: Mastel, Wiski, Maschka and the following were absent: Goedeke, Wall Council Member Maschka introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: Resolution No. 9661 Resolution Approving a 22.8 foot Driveway Access Point (apron) Setback Variance at 2771 Woodbridge Street WHEREAS, Section 703.04B(4) ofthe Roseville City Code requires a minimum driveway access point (apron) setback from a street corner of 30 feet; and WHEREAS, Edward Her, property owner, (hereinafter "applicant") of the lot at 2771 Woodbridge Street, has applied for a 22.8 foot variance to allow a reduction in the 30 foot required setback that would enable him to retain his driveway and street access (apron) in its current location; and WHEREAS, The City's Pavement Management Program and the reconstruction of Woodbridge Street have prompted the variance request; and WHEREAS, the Roseville Planning Commission conducted a public hearing on the request on Wednesday, June 9,1999, and recommended (6-0) approval ofthe requested variance; and WHEREAS, the Roseville City Council received the Planning Commission's recommendation on Tuesday,]une 29, 1999; and WHEREAS, the Roseville City Council made the following findings: 1. Section 1013.02 requires the applicant to demonstrate a physical hardship and to demonstrate that no practical alternatives exist that would reduce the need for a variance. 2. Due to the City's Pavement Management Program and the reconstruction of Woodbridge Street, Mr. Her was required to apply for a variance if he wanted to keep his driveway in its current location. 3. Relocating the access point to meet the 30 foot setback may impact two mature trees and potentially require relocation or removal. 4. Requiring the driveway access point to be adjusted in any capacity would require major Page lof2