pf10-003 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

• • »> Bryan Lloyd <bryan.11oyd@ci.roseville.mn.us> 01/13/10 9:38 AM »> Hi, Steve. The City's email and phone services (for better or worse) run on the same computer-network-thingy, and it all crashed spectacularly yesterday so my ability to communicate officially with the outside world was pretty sketchy. But things are better now, and I'm back! The first thing I want to mention is this: as the Complete Building Maintenance folks are considering the screening options, we'd be happy to review their preferred fence/wall choice(s) to confirm that it would satisfy the City's screening requirements so that they can have some more confidence in the costs as they move forward with their financial negotiations. I also want to check on the latest thinking about the bulk materials bins. I don't recall talking with you about that specifically on Monday, but the fact that you and Mr. Nilsson seemed comfortable with the City Council approving the conditional use, as recommended by the Planning Commission, on the Consent Agenda could suggest that the intent is to locate the bins someplace behind the building. Is that right? If so, I think it would be useful to revise the site plan so that the Council doesn't get tripped up by a plan that continues to show the bins in the front yard. If you don't have the opportunity to revise the site plan yourselves, perhaps you could simply tell me where you're thinking the bins might end up and I can indicate the new location on the site plan included in the Council's packet of information. Finally: I talked with the City Planner and the Community Development Director about the existing fence/gate in the front yard. If I understood what you and I discussed on Monday, the current plan would be to shorten the fence to the permitted 4-foot height while leaving the gate taller for improved security. If the low-quality illustration in the attached PDF represents what you've been thinking, we can accept that. The best-case scenario for the City would be if all of the fencing in front of the building plus the gate would be a maximum of 4 feet tall, but if that doesn't meet Complete Building Maintenance's security needs we can work with a taller gate as long as it can be kept to the same height as the top of a 4-foot fence built on the top of the berm, as I've tried to illustrate in the attachment. (It's not important if the berm isn't 3 feet tall, I was just estimating for the illustration.) Please call or email when you have the chance to let me know how all of this jibes with (or doesn't) the current plans. Bryan Lloyd Associate City Planner City of Roseville 651-792-7073 bryan.11oyd@ci.roseville.mn.us Confidentiality Statement: The documents accompanying this transmission contain confidential information that is legally privileged. This information is intended only for the use of the individuals or entities listed above. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, distribution, or action taken in reliance on the contents of these documents is strictly prohibited. If you have received this information in error, please notify the sender