My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
pf10-004
Roseville
>
Planning Files
>
2010
>
pf10-004
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/28/2014 2:55:58 PM
Creation date
7/2/2013 8:14:08 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Planning Files
Planning Files - Planning File #
10-004
Planning Files - Type
Planning-Other
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
30
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
•. • <br />, the front of the garage 27 �t from the front property line, I wish to voice my opposition <br />as I stated in #3 above. <br />I hope this helps. Please let me know if I can provide you with anything else. <br />Thank you once again for providing the additional information I requested. <br />7ohn Elholm (Rick's neighbor to the north) <br />2466 Chatsworth Street <br />H: (651) 481-7987 <br />W: (651) 430-4303 <br />----- Original Message ----- <br />From: "Bryan Lloyd" <bryan.11oyd@ci.roseville.mn.us> <br />To: "jdelholm@comcast.net" <jdelholm�lcomcast.net> <br />Sent: Wednesday, ]anuary 6, 2010 9:34:19 AM GMT -06:00 US/Canada Central <br />Subject: RE: Property at 2458 Chatsworth Street <br />Thanks for your comments, Mr. Elholm. <br />With respect to your drainage concerns around the side of Mr. Bell's expanded garage: as a <br />zoning-type, I can't tell you much about the technical considerations given to slopes, soils, <br />and drainage, but all plans like this will be reviewed by engineering staff to ensure that <br />drainage is addressed to meet the City's normal standards. We can offer flexibility on the <br />setbacks, but not on the amount of rain water runoff allowed to pass from one property to <br />another. <br />As to the setback from the front property line, you mentioned something about the average <br />setback of the neighboring properties. That's a provision that applies more when somebody <br />proposes to build a new home on a vacant lot between two developed parcels than when <br />additions are being considered decades after the house was built. There's another odd <br />provision in the Code that allows an attached garage to extend beyond the standard 30-foot <br />front yard setback (to 27 feet from the front property line) if there's no living area above <br />the garage. <br />So this present application falls somewhere between the two front setback requirements above, <br />and during our review meeting on Thursday we'll have to sort out exactly how those <br />requirements apply. On one hand, the proposed 27-foot garage setback might be permitted and <br />not require special approval, and on the other hand, special approval through this <br />administrative deviation process might be necessary. In either case, we'll certainly be <br />taking your comments and concerns seriously as we consider Mr. Bell's request. <br />One of the final things that we have to bear in mind in a case like this, however, is the <br />fact that the existing garage is about 12 feet behind the front of the house at its southern <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.