My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
pf10-014
Roseville
>
Planning Files
>
2010
>
pf10-014
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/29/2014 2:04:52 PM
Creation date
7/2/2013 8:17:51 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Planning Files
Planning Files - Planning File #
10-014
Planning Files - Type
Conditional Use Permit
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
160
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
,��, <br />i <br />! <br />Please Note: 1 can provide the anline version of this letter if it would be helpfut. <br />Mo1lyRedmond 651-633-2743 certhial@gmail.com <br />� ��C���L� <br />� APR 26 2010 <br />To: The Roseville Planning Commission By � <br />From: Steven Ring and Margaret (Molly) Redmond home owners,1455 Rose P, <br />re: Request from MN Irrigation Distribution Center for Interim Use Permit for <br />outdoor storage of equipment <br />April 26, 2010 <br />Of the 4 properties directly affected by this permit request, ours is the most affected, as our <br />total northern boundary borders the MIDC property. We are extremely concerned that this <br />deviation from City Code 1007.015 prohibiting open storage bordering residential areas <br />has the potential to seriously reduce our property values. <br />1. SPECIAL CIRCUMSTANCE <br />Our house--as are about 4 others-- is on a slope--probably about 12-14 feet elevation <br />difference from the level of the MIDC property. Thus, the 8-foot privacy fence installed by <br />industry Fall, 2009, does NOT provide the screening needed. We look over most of i� <br />The history noted briefly below has made many of us extremely skeptical about this <br />request, and, as noted, worried that our property value will plummet <br />We still believe mitigation efforts can be worked out—in advance-- that will not <br />compromise Mr. Wicklund's business. <br />Thus, in order to support the Interim Permit Variance Request, we would like to see some <br />concrete requirements written into the permit. <br />2. SPECIFIC MITIGATION MEASURES REQUESTED <br />Specifically, we would like to see: <br />A. A height increase in the privacy fence of 2 feet. <br />B. Mr. Albrecht suggested that he could provide trees for the residence owners on our side <br />of the boundary. We would like to have (on our side of the line) 6-to-7 foot evergreens-- <br />probably spruces, especially in the "holes" that exist in the current line of evergreens. <br />For Redmond/Ring, we'd want at least 2 of these. (Nicholsen's also would be helped by <br />two.) We would like these trees "guaranteed" to live & grow for 5 years. We would <br />certainly commit to watering them. <br />These should be installed by August 1, 2010 <br />C. In fall, 2009, Mr. Albrecht installed a few evergreens on his property, south of the fence. <br />We would like to see those trees "guaranteed" and, if necessary, maintained, ie, watered. <br />If they die, they should be replaced within a season. We would consider doing the <br />watering, but want clarity here. <br />D. As the older evergreens in the original visual barrier required by the City decline, Mr. <br />Albrecht should be replacing them in a timely manner--ie, within a season. <br />Other: <br />A. The Roseville City Forester has suggested a hedge-type evergreen planting of Canadian <br />Hemlock, Summer Snow variety cultivar--which grows to 15-20 feet, as being a possible <br />solution or part thereof. This has not yet been expiored. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.