pf10-021 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

Page 2-2, IR2025 goals: "Roseville has technology that gives us a competitive advantage. " 11. LAND USE CHAPTER Page 4-2, General goal/policy 1.10: "Promote and support the provision of a citywide technology infrczstructure thut is accessible to both the public und private sectors. " iii. TRANSPORTATION CHAPTER Page 5-4, Sustainable Transportation Goals: "Encourage telecommuting through the development of technology infrastructure. " lV. ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AND REDEVELOPMENT CHAPTER Page 7-2, business infrastructure policy 3.4: "Encourage and promote the development of advanced, state-of-the-art telecommc�nicution and informution technology infrastructure to and within Roseville. " V. UTILITIES CHAPTER Page 10-2, goal 3: "Coordinate the installation of communication technology infrastructure to be responsive to rapidly evolving systems. " vi. Page 10-11, Utility improvements: "In addition to water, sanitary sewer, and storm sewer service, development relies upon the availability of private utilities, notably electriciry, natural gas, and communications. While local governments do not control the provision of these services, they do have limited regulatory authority over the location and design of the conveyance infrastructure. The City will continue to facilitate development of these private utilities, while minimizing associated adverse impucts. ... Although water supply and sanitary sewer are the primary focus of this chapter, private utilities (electric, natural gas and telecommunications) are essential elements of Roseville 's well-being and future vitality. Reliable and high-qualiry service is required to attract and keep people and businesses in Roseville. As with municipal utilities, the ongoing replacement and upgrading of aging infrastructure is essential. In the coming years, technology infrastructure will be increasingly important. This technology connects Roseville to the global economy. " 5.3 In anticipation of the public hearing for this request being held at the regular Planning Commission meeting on September 1, 2010, the management company for a neighboring aparhnent property provided comment via email in opposition to the request; the email is included with this report as Attachment D. C.O STAFF RECOMMENDATION Based on the comments and findings in Sections 4-5 of this report, Planning Division staff recommends approval of the proposed CotvD[T1oNAL usE, subject to the following conditions: a. Prior to installing the proposed monopole structure, the applicant shall submit documentation demonstrating that it is engineered in such a way that will prevent damage to the adjacent electrical transmission system in the event of catastrophe; PF10-021 RPCA 092910 Page 4 of 5 • •