Laserfiche WebLink
Review of Design Principals for Twin Lakes Master Plan and Development Area March 14, 2008 <br />PIK Terminal Site at Twin Lakes - Roseville, Minnesota Page 3 of 3 <br />8-Sustainable X <br />9-Sheddin Water X <br />10-S le: Back round vs. Landmark Buildin s X <br />I1-Mechanical Screenin X <br />12-General Landsca in Re uirements X <br />13-Landsca e Desi n S le X <br />14-Si na e X <br />In order to meet the Mixed Vertical Zones item, buildings would need to allow different uses to occur in <br />different levels within the same building. Discount Retail Use vs. Big Box Building Type criteria is met <br />as redevelopment proposal does not propose a retail use. <br />Checklist 5- Design Review Process <br />ltems within Checklist 5 were not analyzed, as the items pertain to the required approval process rather <br />than specific site develop�ne��t criteria. It is anticipated that the criteria of Checklist 5 will be achjeved <br />through the City PUD Approval process. <br />Summarv Checklists 1 - 4 <br />Summary Checklists 1 - 4 <br />Checklist 1- Land use Patterns <br />Checklist 2- Streets and Public <br />Checklist 3 - Frontages <br />Checklist 4 - Buildings <br />Total Checklists 1 - 4 <br />Yes I No <br />3 3 <br />6 0 <br />2 4 <br />13 1 <br />23 8 <br />Further <br />Analys�s <br />3 <br />2 <br />0 <br />0 <br />6 <br />Of the total 37 items listed within checklists 1 through 4, the proposed PIK Terminal redevelopment <br />meets the criteria of 24 items, or 65% of the Design Principles. <br />Please contact o�ir office with questio►�s or if additional information is needed. <br />G:\McGough Development�2007-437-M\_Correspondence\Memo Fabel-Review Dsgn Princip 03-13-08.doc <br />