My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
pf09-033
Roseville
>
Planning Files
>
2009
>
pf09-033
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/29/2014 11:12:57 AM
Creation date
7/2/2013 8:48:14 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Planning Files
Planning Files - Planning File #
09-033
Planning Files - Type
Conditional Use Permit
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
96
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
6.5 The land area of the subject property is approximately 17,000 square feet; � 1017.26B 1 <br />(Impervious Coverage in Shoreland Management Districts) of the City Code permits up <br />to 4,250 square feet of impervious coverage on a lot this size located within 300 feet of <br />Langton Lake. If the proposed garage were constructed, impervious coverage on the <br />property might exceed the 25% maximum; the excess can be eliminated by removing <br />some existing pavement or it can be accommodated through the Administrative Deviation <br />process, so a vAx�ANCE for impervious coverage is neither requested nor recommended. <br />6.6 All of the above Code requirements work together to allow the proposed structure, but <br />this one building will utilize the maximum extent of such allowances and preclude the <br />construction of any other accessory buildings on the property. <br />6.7 REVIEW OF STANDARD CONDITIONAL USE CRITERIA <br />a. Section 1013.01 (Conditional Uses) of the City Code requires the Planning <br />Commission and City Council to consider the following criteria when reviewing a <br />CONDITIONAL USE application: <br />i. Impact on traffic; <br />ii. Impact on parks, streets, and other public facilities; <br />iii. Compatibility of the site plan, internal traffic circulation, landscaping, and <br />structures with contiguous properties; <br />iv. Impact of the use on the market value of contiguous properties; <br />v. Impact on the general public health, safety, and welfare; and <br />vi. Compatibility with the City's Comprehensive Plan. <br />b. Impact on traffic: The Planning Division has determined that an increase in traffic <br />volume, due to the size of the proposed 1,008-square-foot accessory structure on the <br />property, will not be an issue given that the building will be used to meet the daily <br />and seasonal storage needs of a residential property owner and thus will not be <br />creating a destination for commercial or additional residential traffic. <br />c. Impact on parks, streets and other public faciliNes: The Planning Division has <br />determined that the proposed accessory structure is unrelated to the City's parks, <br />streets, and other facilities, and so will not have an adverse impact on them. <br />d. Compatibility ... with contiguous properties: The proposed accessory structure <br />would not change the circulation on the property since it is essentially replacing the <br />previous garage; a site plan is included with this staff report as Attachment D. Of the <br />5 contiguous properties, only two others appear to have accessory structures, one of <br />which is about 600 square feet and the other seems to approach the 864-square-foot <br />limit; other detached buildings in the area, however, range from small garden sheds to <br />larger accessory structures, including one that is nearly 1,100 square feet. Although <br />the proposed building is larger than those found on the contiguous properties and <br />would not be screened from the neighbor to the north, the larger building would allow <br />some of what has been stored outside on the property to be located inside the new <br />structure, reducing the perception of clutter. <br />e. Impact of the use on the market value of contiguous properties: Although the <br />current proposal seeks coND�T�oNaL UsE approval to build the largest accessory <br />structure allowed on a single-family residential property, the Planning Division has <br />PF09-033 RPCA 110409 <br />Page 4 of 6 <br />�� <br />• <br />• <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.