Laserfiche WebLink
coND��1'coNAL usE in the proposed location would not have any adverse effects on <br />Langton Lake that would not also be caused by a permitted structure. <br />6.9 If the vA1z�AtvCE request discussed above is not approved, the applicant has not yet found <br />a garage design that will meet his needs and comply with code requirements, but the <br />Planning Commission can identify any concerns it might have about a 1,008-square-foot <br />garage and require Mr. Martin to work with staff to address those issues. <br />6.10 Based on the current aerial photography, the existing driveway appears to be inconsistent <br />with two current Code standards: the maximum width of 26 feet at the front property line <br />established in §703.04B 1 a(Maximum Driveway Width) and the 5-foot minimum setback <br />from a side property line established in §703.04B9 (Driveways on Private Property). <br />Both of these nonconforming conditions (if they, in fact, exist) can be remedied by <br />removing that part of the driveway that lies within the required side property line setback. <br />7.O STAFF RECOMMENDATION <br />7.1 Based on the comments and findings of Section 5 of this report, Planning Division staff <br />recommends denial of the requested vARtAtvCE, prohibiting an accessory structure from <br />being taller than 15 feet at the midpoint of the roof or having walls in excess of 9 feet tall. <br />7.2 Based on the comments and findings in Section 6 of this report, the Planning Division <br />recommends approval of an accessory structure with a 1,008-square-foot footprint as a <br />CONDITIONAL USE, subject to the following conditions: <br />a. The footprint of the accessory structure shall not exceed 1,008 square feet, and <br />shall comply with all other zoning and building code requirements; <br />b. No garden sheds, storage containers, or additional accessory structures shall be <br />allowed on the property; <br />c. The applicant shall work with Community Development staff to ensure that <br />windows are adequately incorporated into the accessory structure to soften the <br />visual impact on neighboring properties; <br />d. The driveway shall be modified to achieve the 5-foot setback from a side property <br />line required by §703.04B9 (Driveways on Private Property) of the City Code; <br />and <br />e. The CoND[T[oNA[. usE approval shall expire six months after the City Council <br />approval date if the applicant has not received a building permit by that time. <br />8.0 SUGGESTED ACTION <br />8.1 By motion, recommend approval of the proposed coNn�T[oNAL UsE for Richard <br />; Martin, 2970 Mildred Avenue, based on the comments and findings of Section 6 and the <br />� ��r , conditions of Section 7 of this report. <br />��; �. <br />8.2 By motion, recommend denial of the vA�ANCE requested by Richard Martin, 2970 <br />�. Mildred Avenue, based on the comments and findings of Section 5 of this report. <br />Prepared by: Associate Planner Bryan Lloyd (651-792-7073) <br />Attachments: A: Area map C: Proposed building elevations <br />B: Aerial photo D: Site plan <br />PF09-033 RPCA 110409 <br />Page 6 of 6 <br />� <br />• <br />• <br />