My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
pf_03717
Roseville
>
Planning Files
>
Old Numbering System (pre-2007)
>
PF3000 - PF3801
>
3700
>
pf_03717
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/10/2016 11:39:06 AM
Creation date
7/2/2013 8:55:12 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Planning Files
Planning Files - Planning File #
3717
Planning Files - Type
Interim Use Permit
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
88
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Page 2 of 2 <br />Please remain focused on the fact that Roseville will be a better community for the Twin Lakes redevelopment project. <br />• Some may argue that the city has enough commercial, but that is a matter for consumers and the marketplace <br />to decide. The developer has done their homework and it making a substantial investment in the belief <br />Roseville has an appetite for at least this much more commercial use. <br />• Much of the commercial enterprises being brought in, like the almost 9°/a being used for medical, actually will <br />greatly enhance the community and the value of our homes. <br />• We are converting more than 87%+ of the land from trucking and industrial to other activities far less toxic and <br />taxing on our natural resources. <br />• Our adjacent lakes will be safer and healthier because as the land processes the existing contaminants, new <br />contaminants will be produced at a far slower pace. <br />• Substantial funds will be made available to our natural resources through the Park Land Dedication Fees. <br />I can understand some may have been against the redevelopment in its entirety, but we're beyond that stage. Increasing barriers <br />to completion and adding unnecessary costs do nothing but hurt the developer. These costs will be passed on to our newest <br />neighbors, making Roseville a less-attractive place for commerce or to live. The biggest concern I have, though, is the <br />introduction of new contaminants into our city and the unproven contention that crushing materials that have been there for <br />centuries is more dangerous than disrupting that same material for purposes of removal and replacing it with new material that <br />has new contaminants. I believe the concern is genuine. I just think the conclusion is illogical and places the city's natural <br />resources and people at greater risk than the proposed solution. <br />Please support the developer in their efforts to use existing material with existing risks instead of introducing new ones. LeYs <br />begin the process of cleaning up this long time blight on the community. Let's start financing the improvement of our natural <br />resources through the money that will be made available through the park land dedication fees. All that is good for the city and its <br />citizens about the redevelopment project is being held up through this issue. <br />Thank you for your consideration on this matter. <br />Bill Davies <br />464 Lovell Avenue <br />Roseville, MN 55113 <br />H: (651) 483-9698 <br />C: (651) 769-5236 <br />F: (651) 846-4873 <br />E: AsktheCommissioner@yahoo.com <br />OS/22/2006 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.