My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
pf_03730
Roseville
>
Planning Files
>
Old Numbering System (pre-2007)
>
PF3000 - PF3801
>
3700
>
pf_03730
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/28/2014 11:39:33 AM
Creation date
7/2/2013 8:58:49 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Planning Files
Planning Files - Planning File #
3730
Planning Files - Type
Planned Unit Development
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
58
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Roseville Planning Commission Minutes Page 5 <br />April 1, 1987 <br />�. That periphery of parking areas, drives, and islands be con- <br />structed with poured in place concrete curb. <br />5. That final grading, drainage, utility, signing, engineering, <br />and landscape plans be subject to staff approval. <br />6. That the Special Use Permit for a service station convenience <br />store be subject to construction in accordance with drawings <br />P-1, P-2, and P-3 dated February 27, 1987. <br />7. That signs be limited to one pylon, 150 square feet maximum, <br />plus the allowed store siqns. <br />� <br />� <br />That lighting on the west side be limited and subject to <br />staff review. <br />That an access easement be granted on the Frontage Road and <br />at Rice Street on the southeast corner. <br />1Q. That the screening on the trash dumpsters match building <br />materials, and be subject to staff approval. <br />11. That the parapet cover the mechanical systems. <br />Discussion <br />Staff asked for clarification with respect to the special condition <br />relating to access which pertained to future considerations with <br />respect ta the Steichen's site. <br />Stokes asked as to whether there would be liability regarding the <br />private road. Dahlgren replied that there would be liability <br />concerns, but it would be a private issue. <br />R�11 Call, Ayes: <br />Nays: <br />DeBenedet, Goedeke, Moeller, Berry, Maschka, and <br />Johnson. <br />Stokes. <br />Berry moved, Goedeke seconded, that the Shelard Group, Inc. request <br />Special Use Permit for gasoline dispensing be approved at 2�35 Rice <br />Street. <br />Discussion <br />Stokes stated that the additional traffic is inapprogriate, thus <br />he was opposed to the project. <br />Johnson pointed out that highway and road improvements generally <br />follow development. <br />DeBenedet stated that this development is consistent with the <br />Comprehensive Plan and the respective ordinances. <br />5tokes pointed out again that he is opposed to the increased <br />traffic based on the inherent danger that it would present. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.