My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
pf_03708
Roseville
>
Planning Files
>
Old Numbering System (pre-2007)
>
PF3000 - PF3801
>
3700
>
pf_03708
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/29/2014 4:35:21 PM
Creation date
7/3/2013 10:42:35 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Planning Files
Planning Files - Planning File #
3708
Planning Files - Type
Zoning Text Amendment
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
287
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
1 19. Does the ownership side of a duplex need to be updated? Staff Response - <br />2 No. Only the rental unit is subject ta inspection ond updating (which is <br />3 minimo/ - smoke detectors andgraund fault out/ets to protect �enters). And, <br />4 the�e is a rentol license re%ase for fami/y or extended fomi/y renting an <br />5 adjoining unit. <br />7 20. Rents will increase based upon fees? Staff Response - With a$50 per year <br />8 /icense fee the monthly costs is only $4.16 per month. A tenont would <br />9 probably be willing to pay thot omount to be assured that the property is <br />10 being mointained and not a safe ty or heolth hazord. Typical rents in Rosevil/e <br />11 for a 2-bedroom unit overoge $10,200 a yeor and $850.00 per month. <br />12 However, we have been told that many of the "student housing"rentols are <br />13 being chorged between .$'1,500 to $1,800 per month. <br />14 <br />15 21. Would prefer nn inspection progrom with no fee and only periodicnl <br />16 inspections. 15T year if comply, don't reinspect for 5 yeurs. Staff Response - <br />17 In five years, based on Rosevi/le turnover, many units will have seen 2 fo 3 <br />18 different tenants Five years does seem lax and perhaps inspection every <br />19 other years ond at tenant turnover wou/d be more sufficient. The City <br />20 Counci/ determines level of funding through levy and {ees approva/ annuolly <br />21 If there is no fee, it would certainly increose the required levy amount <br />22 (payment by o// city tax payers) to cover fu// program. All obsentee manoged <br />23 units must be inspected yeorly ar every-othe�-year for the program to be <br />24 effective, successful and help to partia/ly support it financially. <br />25 <br />26 Staff Summory Comment - A Renta/ /icensing progrom, while viewed as vital ta <br />27 the city's future by staff, is an issue being driven by Roseville citizens <br />28 concerned obout the negative impact these renta/ o� business prope�ties a�e <br />29 having on their home's prope�ty values and the livability of their neighborhoods <br />30 Furthermore, residents are frustrated with the City's inability to address the <br />31 problems these type of properties cause. Because the city is aging this is a <br />32 prob/em which won't begoing oway. In fact, the issues will increose ond continue <br />33 to be more significant each year without o rental licensing o�dinance. <br />34 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.