My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
pf_03708
Roseville
>
Planning Files
>
Old Numbering System (pre-2007)
>
PF3000 - PF3801
>
3700
>
pf_03708
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/29/2014 4:35:21 PM
Creation date
7/3/2013 10:42:35 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Planning Files
Planning Files - Planning File #
3708
Planning Files - Type
Zoning Text Amendment
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
287
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
REQUEST FOR HRA ACTION <br />Date: 1-17-06 <br />Item No: <br />Staff Approval: Agenda Section: <br />CB/DW <br />PUBLIC HEARING <br />Item Description: Public Hearing for new City Code Sections 907 (Residential Rental <br />Property Licensin� and Inspection for 1 to 4 units) (HF36) <br />1.0 Requested Action: <br />l.l Hold Public Hearing and take public testimony regarding Licensing and Inspection of <br />Residential Rental Property of 1 to 4 units — Proposed City Code Section 907 <br />1.2 Upon conclusion of public hearing make a recommendation regarding the proposed rental <br />licensing ordinance for City Council consideration and adoption in February. <br />2.0 Background on Process: <br />2.1 The Roseville City Council held a public hearing on November 28, 2005 regarding the <br />proposed rental ordinance (Proposed City Code Section 907) as well as a Property <br />Maintenance Code (Proposed City Code Section 907). Of the 382 mailed notices sent <br />regarding these proposed code sections - 16 total comments were received,4 wanted more <br />regulation and were in support, 2 had general questions, and 10 were opposed to the <br />additional ordinances.Of those 10, 4 were duplex owners who live in one side of the <br />property. <br />2.2 Based upon the comments and questions at the public hearing,-staff prepared a summary <br />with responses to each question and suggestion. (Attachment A) <br />2.3 The City Council did not take action at the November 28, 2005 meeting but rather asked that <br />the HRA hold an additional public hearing on January 17, 2006 to consider modifications to <br />the ordinance based upon the comments received. The City Council will consider the <br />adoption of a Property Maintenance Code, independent of a Rental Ordinance, at the January <br />30, 2006 Council meeting after further discussion and review at the January 23, 2006 work <br />session. <br />2.4 In addition, the City Council asked that staff review the new City of Burnsville Ordinance <br />and consider if components of this ordinance can be incorporated into Roseville's proposed <br />Ordinance. A summary of the Burnsville Ordinance is attached along with HRA and City of <br />Roseville staff comments on this type of ordinance (Attachment C). <br />3.0 Why Consider a Rental Ordinance? <br />3.1 During the past ten years, at the Council's request, the HRA, Planning Commission and <br />staff have reviewed the needs for and suggested new tools to retain value in the city's <br />housing stock. Options reviewed include adoption of a Property Maintenance Code (for <br />all properties and buildings within the City) and in addition (more recently) a Rental <br />Licensing Code (for structures with up to 4 units). <br />RHRA_ Rental Licensing & Property Maintenance Public Hearing (01-17-06) - Page 1 of 6 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.