Laserfiche WebLink
This would remove the creation of strict liability misdemeanors, and the charging of <br />liens against the property. Leave existing enforcement ordinances and procedures in <br />place. <br />Motion #7 <br />Delete Section 106.4 (Violntion Penalties) nnd all of Section 107 <br />Leave existing enforcement ordinances and procedures in place. See, for example, the <br />Hopkins Property Maintenance Code. <br />• The violation penalties listea in Section 106.4 are authorities the city currently <br />has available for use now. <br />o Each day can be deemed a separate violation (something we have not <br />used in the past - to my knowledge). <br />o If a violator pays a violation penalty, they cari t then continue to maintain <br />the violation. This is as it applies today. <br />Section 107 places professional standards upon the code enforcement officer. <br />o It also stops a property owner from selling a property without disclosing <br />enforcement actions being taken at a location, something worthwhile (it <br />��oes not stop a sale). <br />� <br />Motion #8 <br />Delete nll of Section 103 (Department of Properh� Maintenance Inspection/ <br />• Tliis z��r�s pre�z�ioi�sl� rez�ist�r� to ��elete tlie reCere�ice to 'rle�nrtnte�it'. It nierely references <br />tlTe Codes Coordinntor r�s the Code Officir�l to darifi� zoho hns enforcement responsibilih�. <br />This section creates a new city department. This has not been studied from either an <br />administrative or fiscal perspective, and has not been budgeted. No need has been <br />shown. Leave existing enforcement ordinances and procedures in place. <br />