pf_03708 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

^ maintenance offenses — where, if anything, we should be looking for moie flexible methods of enforcement to achieve more cooperation and compliance. Section 106 also appears to require creating liens against pioperties (similar to curre,nt practices with unpaic� utilitv bills �vhich o�to_tax rolls on the property) in enforcement actions — which will encumber the owners' ability to sell or transfer ownership of the property if they are unable to maintain or repair it. In fact, Section 107.5 prohibits transfer of ownership as soon as a notice of violation is served and until compliance is achieved. (Once the code inspector has issued a compliance (fix up) order or a citation has been issued shouldn't that be part of tl�e record as pat of the owners disclosure prior to sale as in other issues such as wat�r damage, mold, etc. Isn't_it in_th�_ublic's interest to have the issue iaentifieci and resolved ?) Again, this seems to go in the wrong direction, by forcibly limiting the owners' options to sell or transfer property to someone else better able to take care of it. (VVithout the compliance i�su� bein� known ho�v can the buyer\seller negotiate on the appropriate price? By not revealing buildin� faults, isn't this counter productive to practice of good housin�preservation and buildin� maintenance?) I also have a question about a comment in a previous staff report — that the net result of the proposed code is to require maintenance of properties "only in compliance with the code in effect when they were built." (See the praposed chan�es � in the cit�- ordinance adoptin�the IP�ICy_�.i�hich clarifies this issue.) Again, I can't find anything in the code that limits compliance to previous code standards. Section 101.2 says that the code applies to "all existing residential and non-residential structures" and provides "minimum requirements and standards" for maintenance. Section 101.3 specifically requires that� Existing structures and premises that do not comply with these provisions shall be altered or repaired to provide a minimum level of health and safety as required herein. (Emphasis added). There is no reference to measuring compliance by codes in place at the time of construction. If the impact of the proposed maintenance code is to be limited consistent with staff recommendations, then these sections need to be removed or amended. Another solution would be to leave current code enforcement provisions in our ordinances as is, and consider adopting only some of the maintenance standards (in Chapters 3-7). I will not support the proposed maintenance code unless the scope and enforcement powers are limited consistent with our current ordinances. �