My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
pf_03719
Roseville
>
Planning Files
>
Old Numbering System (pre-2007)
>
PF3000 - PF3801
>
3700
>
pf_03719
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/28/2014 11:28:16 AM
Creation date
7/3/2013 10:46:12 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Planning Files
Planning Files - Planning File #
3719
Planning Files - Type
Variance
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
20
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
. <br />� <br />5. <br />6. <br />7. <br />g. <br />9. <br />`l�c� � C�����C�,���� ���-��� � �',�,n��.p��,�, r�N ��y3� <br />Street Address of Property Involved.• <br />lloo� - I b�� �J C�:��-, ���.� � <br />Complete Le al Description of Property Involved 8c PID No. (below or attached): <br />� � b` � � -�� c`�,-�u� 5 � ,�-, c ,�,n-k s � �. �-+'l � �- �--o+ 3 , (�, I � `� , 1; <br />� � a ,� � � 4� c7, � �-� � v✓� , V� c� �� c� � `�- , Y� i�1 <br />State exactly what is intended to be done on or with the properry which does not coriform ivith the �, <br />Ciry Code: \ , () <br />-1_,n 5��i 1 l c_� �'1'1 U r`1 � Yi'� lLr� `-j � C� ✓� �' �S(\ L� C�I ��- -��/ \,\�. �-' I <br />,/-� . � +Vl � � � �� I,� S c�✓��C'c:rl c_ c_ <br />Additional Repuired Information: <br />A. Narrative: A written narrative, in support of a variance application, in necessary. <br />7'his narrative should fully explain the "hardship(s)" that justify the departure from <br />the strict application of the Code. The term "hardship" or "undue hardship" <br />typically refers to physical characteristics of the property, such as shape, soil <br />conditions, or extreme topography. Neitlier mere inconvenience, nor reduction in <br />��alue alone, is sufficient to justify a variance. The inability to put property to its <br />highest and best use is not considered a hardship or practical difficulty. T'he problem <br />that justifies the variance must be caused by conditions beyond the control of tl�e <br />applicant. The applicant cannot create the condition that requires the variance. <br />B. Proposed plaus (1 Copy) including site plan are required. In addition, landscape plaii, <br />grading and drainage plan, and exterior building elevation dra�i-ings sho�ving <br />building materials may also be required if deemed necessary by the Community� <br />Devetopment Department. Such drawings sl►all be 8-1/2"xll" or I1"x17"or I'lli� <br />digital format. <br />C. In cases of multiple variances, the applicant may be required to submit a property <br />boundary and building survey. <br />Signature: The above statements are true and correct to the best of my knowledge. <br />Applicant Signature: 'i\�-�---r� � � —� <br />Property Owner Signature: _ c` \s'-----� � '> � <br />Date: 3/� �/ o C� <br />Phone #: <br />Fax #: <br />°i`�:�- �1 i�-��la <br />�i`7�- ��c�- � vlc� <br />E-mail Address: �� 1 rY� c, �� cd W� ���� �v L�`Y� <br />Revised December 24, 2003 Q:�Plannin�Zoning�Application Fom�s�Revised Variance Application TP.doc <br />Page 2 of 2 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.