pf_03720 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

3. Whereas, the granting of the variance wilt not signiftcantly impact the health, safety. or general welfare of the community. WHEREAS, the Roseville City Council received the Planning Commission's recommendation on Monday, October 23, 2000; and WHEREAS, the Roseville City Council stipulates that City Code Section 1004.02D5 (Dwelling Dimensions and Appearances and Height, Frontage, Yard and Lot Area Requirements in R-1 Districts) requires a front yard setback of 30 feet and a side yard setback of 5 feet, and further, that Secdon 1016, requires a 75 foot setback from the lake and a lot width at the shoreline of 100 feet, and further, that a variance requires the applicant to prove physical hazdslup and to demonstrate that no practical altematives exist that would reduce the need for a variance, and V1�F�REAS, the Roseville City Council made the following findings: Section 10116.21A1 (Non-Conjormities) stipulates that non-conformiHes can continue but are subject to applicable State Statutes and City Ordinance regarding alterations, repair after damage, discontinuance of use, and intensification of use. 1 The property located at 382 North McCarrons Boulevard is an odd shaped parcel, has steep slopes to the northeast and east, is restricted due to a city sewer line and 20 joot wide easement along the east side ojthe lot, and has no reasonable alternative. The former four-season porch and its current concrete slab joundation are pre- existing, non-conforming shuctures. 3 The Sladky request was forwarded to the Department of Natural Resources (DNR) for review and comment, which the DNR suggested that the Sladky four-season porch should be reduced. The DNR indicated it would not oppose the replacement in the exact location on the existing slab. The unique parcel configuration is classif ed as a pre-existing, non-conformity within the Shoreland Ordinance. The Assistant City Engineer has recommended the Sladkys, through a separate request, apply jor a small easement vacation on the western property line (1 to 2 feet) to reduce any possible future problems with title to the property 6. A strict application of the Ciry Code would work an unusual hardship on the applicant. 7. The hardship is not the applicant's creation.