pf_03720 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

Westerly 2439.05 feet, also except the Easterly S00 feet ojWest 2235.7 feet ojNortherly 400 feet of said Northwest 1/4 of said Section 13, Township 29, Range 13, also except Easterly 100 feet of Westerly 1635.7 feet of N. 400 feet said Northwest 1/4 of said Section 13, Township 29, Range 23, also except Easterly I200 feet of Westerly 1475.7 feet of Northerly 400 feet of said Northwest 1/4 of siad Section 13, Rownship 29, Range 23, also except the Southerly 100 jeet of the North 700 feet of West 400 feet of said Section 13, Township 29, Range 23, also except premises conveyed in "660"Deeds 65, "943"Deeds 141, "947"Deeds 145, "1098" Deeds 413, subject to rights ofpublic in roads, (PIN.• #132923240010); and WHEREAS, the Roberta Sladky lot is a pre-exisNng oddly shaped lot with a width of 48 feet aloag'Lake McCarrons, a depth of approximately 350 feet, total lot size of approximately 15,550 sqyare feet, and a private access to McCarrons Boulevard. A buildable pr�existing non- `�. -�uF►foc�ing lot of record must have a minimum lot width of 70 feet (70% of the standazd 100 foot wide shoreland lot); and WHEREAS, Section 1016.16 (Structure Design Standards) requires struchues to be set back a minimum of 75 feet from the ordinary high watermark (OHV1�. The proposed replacement of the former four-season porch lies approximately 33 feet &om the shoreline of Lake McCarrons or 42 feet into the required 75 foot setback; and WHEREAS, Section 1004.02D5 (Dwelling Dimensions and Appearances and Height, Frontage, Yard and Lot Area Requirements in R-1 Districts) requires a front yard (road side) setback of 30 feet, and a five foot side yazd setback. The Sladky property lies on the north side of Lake McCarrons with a private drive from North McCarrons Boulevazd and no public frontage on a road. The pre-eacisting, non-conforming setback from the west side of the property is 2.9 feet; and WHEREAS, the removal of the former porch was precipitated by water damage. The Sladkys were in the process of remodeling the four-season porch when they discovered extensive damage to the structural support joists of the roof and walls due to water and cazpenter ants. It was determined the porch must be removed. WHEREAS, the Roseville Planning Commission conducted a public hearing on the request on Wednesday, October I 1, 2000, and recommended approval (5-0) of the requested variances, subject to the following: 1. Whereas, the Planning Commission finds that a strict app/ication ojthe City Code would work an unusua[ hardship on the applicant; and 2. Whereas, the hardship was not created by the applicant; and 2