My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
pf_03724
Roseville
>
Planning Files
>
Old Numbering System (pre-2007)
>
PF3000 - PF3801
>
3700
>
pf_03724
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/28/2014 11:31:16 AM
Creation date
7/3/2013 10:52:50 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Planning Files
Planning Files - Planning File #
3724
Planning Files - Type
Variance
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
17
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Q <br />�`ii1� .(�1 I� S� l i�3 <br />Street Add��ess of P��ope�°ry Involved: <br />Con�plete Legal Desc��iption of Prope�°ry Involved & PID No. (below or attached): <br />�i-a`�-��3- �3-c�C��� <br />7. State exactly what is intended to be done on or with the properry which does not corrfo�°»z with tlre <br />Ci Code: <br />�r � �c�u.1�� Pc�sS�� 0.u�a.y $ JI �C�S � ��-�steeS ��C, <br />repc��r i �� ��{�,1 � ��e�� 5�. �� r sal e. .� n�.lo�� -�o �e � o c�:t� c i� 5�o�v� <br />, <br />c:e�v�c���z c�r�ve�a� � <br />8. _�dditional Required Informat n: <br />A. Nai•rati�-e:: ��� «�i-itien narc�ative, in s��pport of a varia�ce ar►plication. in ncr.es�:��-��, <br />T'his narrative should fully explain the "hardship(s)" that justify the departure froni <br />the strict application of the Code. The term "hardship" or "undue hardship" <br />typically refers to physical characteristics of the property, such as shape, soit <br />conditions, or extreme topography. Neither mere inconvenience, nor reduction in <br />�-alue alone, is sufficient to justify a variance. The inability to put property to its <br />highest and best use is not considered a hardship or practical difficulty. The problem <br />that justifies the variance must be caused by conditions beyond the control of t}�e <br />applicant. The applicant cannot create the condition that requires the variance. <br />B. 'ncl ina ' . , cape plan, <br />� f b b <br />necessary y � <br />b <br />e - " F <br />`+��€a�rmat. �i2U (/ i i'J� f� �J "l I�O S� V � � �� �l�-� (r 1 Y! t�Pi! l l�l � <br />C. In cases of multiple variances, the applicant may be required to submit a property <br />boundary and building survey. <br />9. Signature: The above statements are true and correct to the best of my knowledge. <br />` ! , <br />Applicant Signature: d � � 'U, <br />Property Owner Signature: �Q,��.� <br />Date: �il�,�,� , o�i � d (P <br />Phone#: �-11 -�G�� LQ S �- �{�G` �3J�3��.�� (�.� C�� <br />Fax #: <br />E-mail Address: 1M 1 ���.i�E, � C�,� tC ke t�" /}� 1 S d�a�'� r(� �'C� <br />, <br />Revised December 9, 2005 \�netro-inet.us\Roseville\CommDev�PLANNING_AND_ZONING\Application Forms\Land Use <br />Applications\Variance Application(2006).doc <br />Page 2 of 2 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.