My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
pf_03733
Roseville
>
Planning Files
>
Old Numbering System (pre-2007)
>
PF3000 - PF3801
>
3700
>
pf_03733
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/28/2014 11:40:39 AM
Creation date
7/3/2013 10:53:53 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Planning Files
Planning Files - Planning File #
3733
Planning Files - Type
Setback Permit
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
3
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
O�iL�%L006 1�:2i 6517927040 ROSEVILLE ENGINEERIN P�GE 03 <br />8. The minimum pazameters of a sefUack permit include: <br />a. A. setback permit shall not reduce the principal ,rtructure sidc yard required <br />setback by more than 70"/0 or be closer tNan three (3) feet to a property line <br />(as measured to the structure wall). <br />b. A setbaek permit shall not reduce thc principal structure front or rear yard <br />required setbaek by more tha�q 20% or be c(oser than twenty-four (24) feet to <br />a front or rear property 1ine. <br />c. A setback permit shall not reduce the accessory structure side or rear yard <br />required setback by more than 70"/0 or be closer than three (3) feet to a <br />property 1'rne. <br />�� <br />A. setback permit shall not reduce the setback of a driveway by more than <br />70% or al[ow a driveway to be closer than two (2) feet to a property line. As <br />an exception, drivew�ys existing prior to October 26, t998, and, located closec <br />than two (2) feet to a property line may be replaced with a setback permit. <br />9. A minimum of eiglxt (8) of the following twelve (12) site conditions inust be met in ordez or a <br />Setback Permit to be issued by the Community Development Director. Circic w•hich ]�ave been <br />complied with and explain how compliance has been achieved. — Do �I� N�E� -Fa Fi LL o�,�T. <br />a. One car garage nr les.r is loca�ed on the si�e. <br />b. 77�e proposed project inaproies the design or livabrlity of the structure. <br />c. The propnsed project improves �Ae 7errain or a drainage iss��e. <br />d. The original reason or need for the setback permit was not created by the current <br />owner. <br />e. The existing improvemenls along with proposed improvemenl retain a minimum oj <br />70% of 1he pervious surface and green space of the lot. <br />f. Tlie proposed project creates no ather se�back or variance condittorzs. <br />�. The proposed projec! improves the aesthetics, covei�ed storage, or the fr<ncfional <br />u.ce of the si1e. <br />h. The proposed project uses �he sm�ae exterior structure �narerial,s and colors as iJ�e <br />princrpal szructure and accessorfes. <br />i. The f:nal building naass is consistent wilh thal nn corztiguous properties. <br />j. The building or driveway expansiordaddiiion does not place more vehicles <br />adjacent !o livir�g quarfer frrst.�lnor bedrooms ofadjacenr homeowners. <br />k. The drainage and rnnf guzre�s ��ide water mvay from the s�ructure and adjacent <br />slruclure.r. <br />1. The roof is properl�� propordioned !o and integrated wrtlz !he roof of the principad <br />strvcture (dx�ellin,v� on the pro�erry. <br />10. Ihe following information/materials must be submitted by the applicant (and determined <br />complete by the Community Development Director) ten (10) days Uefore the application may be <br />considered by the Development Revicw Committee: <br />a, Applicafion '---'aric,`.QC-vi °�,�. <br />PTge 2 of 3 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.