My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
pf_03735
Roseville
>
Planning Files
>
Old Numbering System (pre-2007)
>
PF3000 - PF3801
>
3700
>
pf_03735
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/28/2014 11:41:06 AM
Creation date
7/3/2013 10:54:13 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Planning Files
Planning Files - Planning File #
3735
Planning Files - Type
Setback Permit
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
4
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
8. The minimum parameters of a setback pennit include: <br />a. A setback permit shall not reduce the principal structure side yard required <br />setback by more than 70% or be closer than three (3) feet to a property line <br />(as measured to the structure wall). <br />b. A setback permit shall not reduce the principal structure front or rear yard <br />required setback by more than 20% or be closer than twenty-four (24) feet to <br />a front or rear property line. <br />c. A setback permit shall not reduce the accessory structure side or rear yard <br />required setback by more than 70% or be closer than three (3) feet to a <br />property line. <br />� d. A setback permit shall not reduce the setback of a driveway by more than <br />' - 70% or allow a driveway to be closer than two (2) feet to a property line. As <br />an exception, driveways existing prior to October 26, 1998, and located closer <br />than two (2) feet to a property line may be replaced with a setback permit. <br />9. A minimum of eight (8) of the following twelve (12) site conditions must be met in order or a <br />Setback Permit to be issued by the Community Development Director. Circle which have been <br />complied with and explain how compliance has been achieved. �- ;�,� ,.;�- r.; s:_ ;� ;-;-:- �= ;. .. -. <br />a. One car garage o�° less is located on the site. <br />b. The p�°oposed p�°oject improves the design or lil�ability of the structure. <br />c. The p��oposed project imp�•oves the te�•��ain or a drainage issue. <br />d. The original ��eason or need for tl�e setback per�nit was not created by the current <br />owner. <br />e. The existing impi•ovements along ��ith proposed imp�•ovement retain a minimurn of <br />i 0% of the pe��vious su� face and green space of the lot. <br />f. The p�roposed p�°oject creates no other setback o�° variance conditions. <br />g. The p�roposed p��oject improves the aesthetics, cove��ed sto�•age, or the functional <br />use of the site. <br />h. The proposed p�roject uses the same exterior structure materials and colors as the <br />p��incipal structure and accessories. <br />i. The fi��al building mass is consistent with tl�at on contiguous prope��ties. <br />j. The building or driveway expansion/addition does not place mo�•e vehicles <br />adjacent to living qua��ter fi��st floor bedroon2s of adjacent homeowners. <br />k. The d�°ainage a�7d roof gutters guide water away from tl�e structure and adjace»t <br />structu��es. <br />1. The �roof is properly proportioned to and integ��ated ��ith the �°oof of the principal <br />st��ucture (d�velli�� on the prope��ry. <br />10. The following inforn7ation/materials must be submitted by the applicant (and determined <br />complete by the Community Development Director) ten (10) days before the application may be <br />considered by the Development Review Committee: <br />a. Application �r�-fe�o-f�-�.. <br />Page 2 of 3 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.