My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
pf_03737
Roseville
>
Planning Files
>
Old Numbering System (pre-2007)
>
PF3000 - PF3801
>
3700
>
pf_03737
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/28/2014 11:41:33 AM
Creation date
7/3/2013 10:54:39 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Planning Files
Planning Files - Planning File #
3737
Planning Files - Type
Setback Permit
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
4
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
8. The minimum parameters of a setback permit include: <br />a. <br />A setback permit shall not reduce the principal structure side yard required <br />setback by more than 70% or be closer than three (3) feet to a property line <br />(as measured to the structure wall). <br />b. A setback permit shall not reduce the principal structure front or rear yard <br />required setback by more than 20% or be closer than twenty-four (24) feet to <br />a front or rear property line. <br />c. <br />,-� <br />�, d. i <br />:�. <br />A setback permit shall not reduce the accessory structure side or rear yard <br />required setback by more than 70% or be closer than three (3) feet to a <br />property line. <br />A setback permit shall not reduce the setback of a driveway by more than <br />?0°10 0*_- allow ��r�veway to he claser th�n two (2) feet to a pronerty line. As <br />an exception, driveways existing prior to October 26, 1998, and located closer <br />than two (2) feet to a property line may be replaced with a setback permit. <br />9. A minimum of eight (8) of the following twelve (12) site conditions must be met in order or a <br />Setback Permit to be issued by the Community Development Director. Circle which have been <br />complied with and explain how compliance has been achieved. — �o ��-; � ��� -{-;, r ; ;_ _ ., � � ; , <br />a. One car garage or less is located on the site. <br />b. The proposed project improves the design or livability of the structure. <br />c. The proposed project improves the terrain or a drainage issue. <br />d. The original reason or need for the setback peJ°mit was not created by the current <br />e. <br />f. <br />g• <br />h. <br />i. <br />]• <br />k. <br />1. <br />owner. <br />The existing improvements along with proposed improvement retain a mirrimum of <br />70% of the pe��vious surface and g�°een space of the lot. <br />The proposed p�•oject creates no othe�� setback o�° variance conditions. <br />The proposed project improves the aesthetics, cove�°ed storage, or the functional <br />use of the site. <br />The proposed p��oject uses the same exterior structure materials and colors as the <br />principal structure and accessories. <br />The frnal building mass is consistent with that on contiguous properties. <br />The building or driveway expansion/addition does not place more vehicles <br />adjacent to living quarter first floor bedrooms of adjacent homeowners. <br />The drainage and roof gutters guide lvater aN�ay fronz the structu�°e and adjacent <br />structures. <br />The �•oof is properly proportioned to and integrated with the roof of the principal <br />structure (dwellin� on the prope��ty. <br />10. The following information/materials must be submitted by the applicant (and determined <br />complete by the Community Development Director) ten (10) days before the application may be <br />considered by the Development Review Committee: <br />a. Application � a � � �F °"'-�.. <br />Page 2 of 3 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.