Laserfiche WebLink
b. The proposed project improves the design or livability of the structure. <br />c. Tl�e proposed project irr�proves the terrain or a drainage issue. <br />/1•. � .a ' , � <br />� <br />�. The original reason or need for the setback permit was not created by the cuYrent <br />owner. 1 <br />,�ll ��- <br />e. The existing improvements along with proposed improvement retain a minimum of <br />70% of the pervious surface and green space of the lot. <br />f. The proposed project creates no other setback or variance conditions. <br />�� <br />g. The proposed project improves the aesthetics, covered storage, or the functional <br />use of the site. <br />� <br />,, <br />h. The proposed project uses the same exterior structure materials and colors as the <br />principal structure and accessories. <br />i. The final building mass is consistent with that on contiguous properties. <br />/,-•, <br />r. i���- <br />j. The building or driveway expansion/addition does not place more vehicles <br />adjace�nt to living quarter first floor bedrooms of adjacent homeowners. <br />',. 1 �' ' . . • <br />k, The drainage and roof gutters guide water away from the structure and adjacent <br />structures. , <br />i <br />1. The roof is properly proportioned to and integrated with the roof of the principal <br />structure (dwelling) on the property. <br />Other Comments: <br />��. �k }� ; , � ,. <br />, . <br />Page 2 of 2 <br />