My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
pf_03765
Roseville
>
Planning Files
>
Old Numbering System (pre-2007)
>
PF3000 - PF3801
>
3700
>
pf_03765
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/28/2014 12:11:04 PM
Creation date
7/3/2013 11:24:04 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Planning Files
Planning Files - Planning File #
3765
Planning Files - Type
Setback Permit
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
4
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
� <br />8. The ininimuin parameters of a setback pennit include: <br />e� <br />A setback permit shall not reduce the principal structure side yard required <br />setback by more than 70% or be closer than three (3) feet to a property line <br />(as measured to the structure wall). <br />b. A setback permit shall not reduce the principal structure front or rear yard <br />required setback by more than 20°/a or be closer than twenty-four (24) feet to <br />a front or rear property line. <br />c. <br />,.. <br />; d <br />� <br />.; . <br />. .._... . . ��..,., <br />�. <br />A setback permit shall not reduce the accessory structure side or rear yard <br />required setback by more than 70% or be closer than three (3) feet to a <br />property line. <br />A setback permit shall not reduce the setback of a driveway by more than <br />^�% or aLow a driv�way to �e elaser t�an tvv� (2) feet ±o a prope�-ty line. As <br />an exception, driveways existing prior to October 26, 1998, and located closer <br />than two (2) feet to a property line may be replaced with a setback permit. <br />9. A minimum of eight (8) of the following twelve (12) site conditions must be met in order or a <br />Setback Permit to be issued by the Community Development Director. Circle which have been <br />complied with and explain how compliance has been achieved. ; -� �'� ,�- r = ;:? � ,�-. �- _ . . <br />a. One car ga�°age or less is located on the site. <br />b. TI�e proposed project improves the design or livabiliry of the structure. <br />c. The p�•oposed p�roject imp�°oves the te��rain or a drainage issue. <br />d. The origi�zal reason or need foY the setback per�nit was not created by the current <br />e. <br />f. <br />g• <br />h. <br />i. <br />]• <br />k. <br />1. <br />owner. <br />The existing improvements along lvith prroposed impi°ovement retain a minimum of <br />70% of the pei°vious surface and g�°een space of the lot. <br />The plroposed p�roject c��eates no othe�� setback o�� variance conditions. <br />The p�°oposed project improves the aesthetics, covei°ed sto�•age, o�° t1�e functional <br />use of the site. <br />The p��oposed pi°oject uses the same exte��ioi• structui°e mate��ials and colors as the <br />p��incipal st��uctu��e and accessories. <br />The final building mass is consistent wit%z that on contiguous p��operties. <br />The building o�� drive���ay expansion/addition does not place more vehicles <br />adjacent to living quarter first floo�� bedr�ooms of adjacent hon2eo�vners. <br />The d��ainage and roof gutte�°s guide 1��ate�� away fi^om tlze st�°uctu�°e and adjacent <br />structu�^es. <br />The roof is properly proportioned to and integ��ated with the ��oof of the p�°incipal <br />strarcture (dwelling) on the property. <br />10. The following information/materials must be submitted by the applicant (and determined <br />complete by the Community Development Director) ten (10) days before the application inay be <br />considered by the Development Review Committee: <br />Application a�r�-f�-o-€-$?-�.. <br />Page 2 of 3 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.