My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
pf_03781
Roseville
>
Planning Files
>
Old Numbering System (pre-2007)
>
PF3000 - PF3801
>
3700
>
pf_03781
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/28/2014 12:34:14 PM
Creation date
7/3/2013 11:36:30 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Planning Files
Planning Files - Planning File #
3781
Planning Files - Type
Variance
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
126
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
EXTR.ACT OF MINUTES OF MEETING OF THE <br />CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE <br />Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of <br />Roseville, County of Ramsey, Minnesota, was held on the 9`h day of October, 2006, at 6:00 p.m. <br />The following members were present: <br />and the following were absent: <br />Council Member introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: <br />RESOLUTION NO. <br />A RESOLUTION DENYING A VARIANCE TO �1004.016 AND IN ACCORDANCE <br />WITH �1013.02 OF THE ROSEVILLE CITY CODE FOR CHARLES WELECZHI, <br />AND THE VACANT PARCEL AT DALE STREET AND DALE COURT (PF3781). <br />WHEREAS, Charles Weleczki is the owner of the vacant developable parcel at Dale <br />Street and Dale Court; and <br />WHEREAS, the subject property is legally described as: <br />REQ UIRES LEGAL DESCRIPTION <br />WHEREAS, the property owner seeks a 15 foot VARIANCE to § 1004.016 (Residential <br />Dimensional Requirements — Front Yard Setback) to allow greater flexibility in the design of a <br />principal structure on the uniquely shaped parcel at Dale Court and Dale Street; and <br />WHEREAS, The Roseville Variance Board held the public hearing regarding the <br />VARIANCE request, voting 3-0 to DENY based on their determination that "hardships" were <br />not present and that the need for the variance was created by the applicant/property owner; and <br />WHEREAS, the applicant has appealed the decision of the Variance Board to the <br />Roseville City Council seeking the Council's support for the requested 15 front yard setback <br />VARIANCE; and <br />WHEREAS, the Roseville City Council concurs with the determination of the Variance <br />Board, determining the following finding of fact: <br />1. That a hardship, if any exists, was caused by the current property owner. <br />2. That a principal structure with attached garage could be designed and constructed <br />on the parcel. <br />3. That a 15 foot encroachment into the required front yard setback is detrimental to <br />the general health, safety, and welfare of the adjacent neighborhood. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.