pf_03781 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

4.2 State Statute 462.357, subd. 6(2) provides authority for the city to "hear requests for variances from the literal provisions of the ordinance in instances where their strict enforcement would cause undue hardship because of circumstances unique to the uidividual property under consideration, and to grant such variances oi�ly when it is demonstrated that such actions will he in keeping with the spirit and intent of the ordinance. 'Undue hardship' as used in connectionwith the granting of a variance means the property in question cannot be put to a reasonable use if used under conditions allowed by the official controls, the plight of the landowner is due to circumstances unique to the property not created by the landowner, and the variance, if granted, will not alter the essential character of tbe locality. Economic considerations alone shall not constitute an undue hardship if reasonable use for the property exists under the terms of the ordinance ... The board or governing body as the case may he may impose conditions in the granting of variances to insure compliance and to protect", STAFF COMMENTS ON VARIANCE CRITERIA: 4.3 The plight of the landowncr is due to circumstances anique to the nrouert� not created hv the landowner: Designing a home on this uniquely shaped parcel is a challenge and one tiiat has not been abie to be overcome by 6 ootential owner/'nuiiders. Though previous statements and the previous approval of the parcel were predicated on a house design that could meet all required setbacks, the uniquely shaped parcel and its required setbacks restrict design and functional use of the parcel for home/gaxage �urposes. The Planning Division has concluded that the pli�ht of the landowner is due to circumstances unique to the property, which uniqueness is better addressed through the granting of a 15 foot front yard VARIACE. 4.4 The nronertv in quesYion cannot be put to a reasonable use if used under conditions allowed bv the official controls: The City Planner concludes that the required front yard or rear yard setback is too restrictive to accommodate a funetionally designed home of a modest size on the parcel. The Planner has further concluded that a VARIANCE to the required front yard setback of 15 feet would provide greater design flexibility and afford the eventual purchaser enough latitude to construct a home and attached garage. The Planning Division has concluded that the property can be put to a reasonable use under the official controls if a 15-foot VARIAIVCE to fj1004.016 (Residential DiinensionalRequirements—FrontYard Setback) is granted. )�F�7k I�R�r'►_��:�I_tN��5��F�v� � :o-f �