Laserfiche WebLink
Appeal Letter to the City of Roseville <br />September 15,2006 <br />Page 10 <br />unconventionally designed structure that is inconsistent with the neighborhood and which <br />would not be as aestheticallypleasing. It is in the best interests of the City to have the lot <br />improved with a livable, family single structure so that another family can call Roseville <br />home. <br />While the strict letter of the City Code may not allow for a traditionally designed <br />home, it is within the power of the Ciry Cotmcil and in fact specifically peimitted by the <br />Code to allow this variance. <br />The Council could deny this request to � certain that this parcel complies <br />strictly with the City Code. However, to do so is not necessarily consistent with the <br />stated objectives of the Comprehensive Plan, the interests of the City, the interests of the <br />neighborhood or with simple � sense. The Applicants merely desire to sell the lot <br />to a builder or family who will build a relatively modest home having a traditional design <br />(instead of a very unique or whacky triangular shape) which would otherwise be <br />consistent with other homes in the neighborhood. <br />It simply n�alces sense to allow the Applicants' request. Denying the request may <br />be compliant with the strict letter of the Code, but it really does not malce a lot of <br />common sense in the larger scheme of what should be important to the City of Roseville. <br />Thus, for the foregoing reasons the Applicants' request should be approved. <br />Thanlc you for your time and consideration. <br />�� <br />4'er};.E�u1Y �+a�}c , <br />�� ��F <br />, � <br />f'���� ����__- <br />Tadd I�. lliff <br />Charles Weleczki <br />Suzanne ��eteczlci <br />TRI�'tem <br />encl. <br />