Laserfiche WebLink
5.5 Section 1013 of the Code states: "Where there are practical difficulties or unusual <br />hardships in the way of carrying out the strict letter of the provisions of this code, <br />the Variance Board shall have the power, in a specific case and after notice and <br />public hearings, to vary any such provision in harmony with the general purpose <br />and intent thereof and may impose such additional conditions as it considers <br />necessary so that the public health, safety, and general welfare may be secured and <br />substantial justice done." <br />5.6 State Statute 462.357, subd. 6(2) provides authority for the city to "hear requests for <br />variances from the literal provisions of the ordinance in instances where their strict <br />enforcement would cause undue hardship because of circumstances unique to the <br />individual property under consideration, and to grant such variances only when it is <br />demonstrated that such actions will be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the <br />ordinance. `Undue hardship' as used in connection with the granting of a variance <br />means the property in question cannot be put to a reasonable use if used under <br />conditions allowed by the official controls, the plight of the landowner is due to <br />circumstances unique to the property not created by the landowner, and the <br />variance, if granted, will not alter the essential character of the locality. Economic <br />considerations alone shall not constitute an undue hardship if reasonable use for the <br />property exists under the terms of the ordinance ... The board or governing body as <br />the case may be may impose conditions in the granting of variances to insure <br />compliance and to protect". <br />5.7 The nli�ht of the landowner is due to circumstances unipue to the propertv not <br />created by the landowner: To say that the plight of any landowner (current or new <br />purchaser) is due to circumstances unique to the property not created by the property <br />owner may be a stretch. However, the fact of the matter still exists that designing a home <br />on this uniquely shaped parcel is a challenge and one that has not been able to be <br />overcome by 6 potential owner/builders. Though previous statements and the previous <br />approval of the parcel were predicated on a house design that could meet all required <br />setbacks, the uniquely shaped parcel and its required setbacks restrict design and <br />functional use of the parcel for home/garage purposes. The Planning Division has <br />determined that the plight of the landowner is due to circumstances unique to the <br />property, which uniqueness is better addressed through the granting of a 15 foot <br />front yard VARIACE. <br />5.8 The property in question cannot be put to a reasonable use if used under conditions <br />allowed bv the official controls: The City Planner concludes that the required front <br />yard or rear yard setback is too restrictive to accommodate a functionally designed home <br />of a modest size on the parcel. The Planner has further concluded that a VARIANCE to <br />the required front yard setback of 15 feet would provide greater design flexibility and <br />afford the eventual purchaser enough latitude to construct a home and attached garage. <br />The Planning Division has determined that the property can be put to a reasonable <br />use under the official controls if a 15-foot VARIANCE to §1004.016 (Residential <br />Dimensional Requirements — Front Yard Setback) is granted. <br />PF3781_KVBA_090606Page 3 of � <br />