My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2013_0708(part 2)
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
2013
>
2013_0708(part 2)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/12/2013 9:56:13 AM
Creation date
7/5/2013 10:57:24 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
150
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Attachment D <br /> <br />E XTRACT OF THE J UNE 5,2013R OSEVILLE P LANNING C OMMISSION MINUTES <br />a. PROJECT FILE 13-0017 <br />Request by Roseville Planning Division for consideration of a ZONING TEXT <br />CHANGE AND ZONING MAP CH ANGE creating a regional Business-2 District (RB- <br />2), specific to Limited Production/Processing; to amend the permitted uses chart <br />of 1005-1 to include Limited Production/Processing as a permitted and accessory <br />use within the RB-1 and RB-2 Districts; and to modify the definition of Limited <br />Production/Processing for an accessory and principal use <br />Chair Gisselquist opened the Public Hearing for Project File 13-0017 at approximately <br />7:17 p.m. <br />City Planner Paschke reviewed this requested ZONING TEXT AMENDMENT as detailed <br />in the staff report dated June 5, 2013. Mr. Pa schke noted that this it em had come before <br />the Planning Commission at a previous public hearing in October of 2012; with <br />subsequent City Council recommendations on March 25, 2013 for further review of a <br />possible map amendment to support inclus ion of Limited Production and Processing in <br />the Regional District instead of the proposed text amendment originally sought. Mr. <br />Paschke displayed a map of exis ting uses in place, and conc erns raised by business and <br />property owners, and those areas deemed appropriate; and clarified that the request <br />would require a Comprehensive Plan Amendment. <br />Member Daire arrived at this time; approximately 7:23 p.m. <br />Various examples were discussed (e.g. Edible Arrangements; CPI; Fastenal; take-out <br />pizza shops; banks) and definitions or distinctions for commercial versus manufacturing <br />uses and processing and/or production uses, as well as retail versus manufacturing as <br />the primary business or use. <br />Mr. Paschke clarified the intent for quiet, clean types of manufacturing uses defined as <br />Limited Production under the principle use <br />Member Cunningham opined that she would be an advocate for allowing this type of <br />business in all Zoning Districts; and would simply clarify pre-existing uses in the <br />community. <br />Chair Gisselquist opined that another distinction could be made between those uses with <br />more employee versus customer traffic, such as would be found in with a retail <br />component. <br />Chair Gisselquist closed the Public Hearing at approximately 7:28 p.m.; with no one <br />appearing for or against. <br />MOTION <br />Cunningham/Olsen <br />Member Cunningham moved, seconded by Member Olsen to recommend to the <br />City Council APPROVAL of the proposed ZONING TEXT CHANGE to Section <br />1001.10, Definitions of the Zoning Ordinance, the ZONING TEXT CHANGE to Table <br />1005-1, and the creation of the RB-2 Zoning District to allow the permitted and <br />conditional use of Limited Production and Processing; based on the comments <br />and findings of Sections 4 and 5 and the recommendation of Section 7 of the staff <br />report dated June 5, 2013. <br />Ayes: 6
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.