Laserfiche WebLink
I : �[�;Sl�3�1i�� <br />3.1 During the review/consideration of a CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT for the Walser <br />Automotive Group's proposal to redevelop the former McCarthy Pontiac GMC Truck <br />dealership at 2775 Highway 35 (July 12, 2006), it was noted that the applicant was in the <br />process of converting an existing lease with the Minnesota Department of Transportation <br />(MNDOT) to allow parking of vehicles directly south of the subject parcel. At that time <br />the City Planner indicated that staff and the City Attorney would need to review the lease <br />to determine how the City Code is applied — in essence to determine whether a side yard <br />setback for the parking lot be required. <br />3.2 Since the Commission's hearing and recommendation of support, the Walser <br />CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT has been approved by the City Council (August 14, <br />2006) and the City Attorney has determined that a VARIANCE is required to allow a five <br />foot parking lot encroachment for the southern parking lot as proposed by the applicant. <br />4.0 STAFF COMMENT: <br />4.1 Section 1005.01 (Business District Minimum Dimensional Requirements) requires a <br />minimum side yard parking lot setback of 5 feet. <br />4.2 The proposal submitted by the applicant seeks to construct a parking lot up to and over <br />the south property line a distance of 7-1/2 feet. This parking lot design will afford <br />Walser extra vehicle display for 41 vehicles. <br />4.3 The applicant is currently negotiating with the MNDOT the conversion of the McCarthy <br />lease to include an area 20 feet in width and 440 feet in length on which a portion will be <br />paved for vehicle parking. <br />4.4 The applicant has indicated that, should the lease not be renewed by MNDOT, the owner <br />will remove the necessary amount of paving (or greater) and install the required concrete <br />curb and gutter <br />4.5 In light of the required setback from the property line, the subject area (actually larger <br />than Walser desires to use) has been used for vehicle purposes for many years. Aerial <br />photography indicates parking up to the south property line in 1974 and parking on the <br />MNDOT property in 1985. Further, many of the dealerships adjacent to the subject <br />property were constructed under different Code requirements affording most the ability to <br />construct parking lots up to property line. <br />4.6 The variance proposed herein, if granted, will not adversely affect the public health, <br />safety, or general welfare if approved with conditions. These conditions are laid out in <br />Section 6 of this report. <br />PF3785_RVBA_0090606.doc Page 2 of 2 <br />