Laserfiche WebLink
Attachment B: 10/23/06 RCA Packet <br />REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION <br />DATE: 10/23/06 <br />ITEM NO: <br />Department Approval: City Manager Approval: <br />BL/JS <br />Agenda Section: <br />Item Description: APPEAL of the VARIAIANCE BOARD'S action to DENY the request by <br />Thomas McDaniel for a VARIANCE to §1016 (Wetlands) of the Roseville <br />City Code to allow a principal structure encroachment into the required <br />setback from a wetland at 527 Owasso Hills Drive (PF3787) <br />1.0 <br />1.1 <br />BACKGROUND <br />Thomas McDaniel owns the property located at 527 Owasso Hills Drive. The property is <br />zoned R-1, Single Family Residential, and the Comprehensive Plan identifies the <br />property as Low Density Residential. <br />1.2 The variance request has been prompted by the applicant's desire to construct an addition <br />of approximately 15 feet by 18 feet in size that would reduce the setback from the <br />wetland to about 35 feet. <br />1.3 The City Engineer is the City's designated administrator of the Wetland Conservation <br />Act; as such, she has deternuned that a natural wetland was present when the site was <br />developed in 1995-1996 and has been enlarged, to some degree, as a result of the use of <br />the wetland since then as a storm water retention pond. <br />1.4 On October 4, 2006 the Roseville Variance Board held the public hearing regarding the <br />request by Thomas McDaniel seeking a VARIANCE to §1016.016 (Wetlands) of the <br />City Code to allow the construction of an addition onto the rear of his home. The <br />proposed addition would encroach approximately 15 feet into the required 50-foot <br />setback from a wetland. <br />1.5 City staff recommended that the variance be denied because no undue hardship would be <br />imposed on the properly owner if the requirements of the Code were strictly applied; <br />demonstrating such hardship is necessary for variance approval. <br />1.6 The Variance Board voted 3-0 to deny the request. <br />1.7 Section 1014.04C of the City Code states that the City Council acts as the Board of <br />Adjustment in variance appeal actions and that an appeal must be acted upon by the City <br />Council at their next regular meeting. <br />PROJECT REVIEW HISTORY <br />• Application submitted: September 6, 2006 <br />• Determined complete: September 8, 2006 <br />• Sixty-day review deadline: November 5, 2006 <br />• Variance Board action: October 4, 2006 <br />PF3787_RCA_Appeal_ 102306 <br />Page 1 of 5 <br />