My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
pf_03788
Roseville
>
Planning Files
>
Old Numbering System (pre-2007)
>
PF3000 - PF3801
>
3700
>
pf_03788
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/28/2014 12:50:27 PM
Creation date
7/8/2013 10:33:05 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Planning Files
Planning Files - Planning File #
3788
Planning Files - Type
Setback Permit
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
14
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Page 1 of 1 <br />Bryan Lloyd <br />To: david <br />Subject: Setback Permit concerns <br />Hi again, David. <br />The Building Official (Don I�Zunson) did a litde more research on your proposal. According to City data (��ia the online <br />mapping server accessible from the City's homepage), it appears that your house is about 30 feet from the south property <br />line; if this is accurate, there's not sufficient room for a 24-foot garage, a 6-foot separation from the residential building, and <br />a setback of any kind. (r1 3-foot setback and a 24-foot garage, as you've proposed, would only leave a 3-foot separarion <br />from the house.) Even if the City's data is off by as much as a foot or two, you'd still need a formal variance for the <br />encroachment into the side yard setback and/or the reduced separation from the house. If you have a survey of your <br />property that shows at least 33 feet between the foundarion of the house and the property line (i.e., 3-foot setback + 24- <br />foot garage + 6-foot separarion from the house), we can still consider your Setback Pertnit application. <br />If you're able to demonstrate that there i�indeed sufficient space for your proposal, and if the Development Review <br />Committee does approve the Setback Perirut by the tune you'd like to pour the slab, there is still the matter of the 10-day <br />appeal period following the DRC's decision. So far, I've only heard from your neighbor to the south, Andy Quist; your <br />neighbor to the north and the three homeowners across the street still need to contact me (b�� mail or phone or email) in <br />order to dispense with the 10-day appeal period. And, of course, you'll �vant to submit y our building plans (if you haven't <br />already) so that a building permit may be issued. <br />1�1r. 1�lunson also pointed out that, according to building code requirements, the vertical distance bet�veen the the garage <br />footings and the house footings can't be any greater than the horizontal distance between them. That is, assuming your <br />house footings are 8 feet deep, your garage footings would need to be at least 5 feet deep if the garage wall is 3 feet away <br />from house wall. Don noted that the deep footings and the fire-protection that would be required for a garage wall so closc <br />to the house �vill substantiall}' increase the cost of the project - an attached garage may turn out to be a comparably priccd <br />option. <br />Despite my best efforts to help you meet your goal of pouring cement by the iniddle of this month, I'm not sure we can still <br />make it - especially if 5�ou'll need a variance. <br />Bryan Lloyd <br />Associate City Planner <br />City of Roseville <br />651-792-7073 <br />�an.11oyd a,ci.roseville.mn.us <br />10/10/2006 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.