Laserfiche WebLink
7.5 Utilities: The City has adequate sanitary sewer, storm water, and water main <br />infrastructure in place and plans for extensions to support the development project. The <br />Public Works Department has reviewed the concepts and must approve all of these plans. <br />7.6 Mechanical Equipment: The placement of inechanical equipment can create visual and <br />noise issues. Given the proposal, it is assumed that air conditioning units for town homes <br />will be placed on the ground and in the case of the loft/condominium/vista structures it is <br />assumed that heating, cooling, and ventilating equipment need to be affixed as wall units <br />to the building facade, placed on the ground, or placed within roof cavities. Those units <br />that are ground units should be screened from view. Should an emergency generator be <br />contemplated for the housing buildings, the plans must indicate the proposed location. <br />The generator must meet all applicable State decibel levels. Staff will work with <br />Rottlund on addressing potential mechanical equipment issues. <br />7.7 Environmental: The entire Twin Lakes area is considered a"Brownfield". This means <br />that the parcels contain some level of environmental contamination. The first significant <br />contamination the city encountered was identified during the construction of Arthur <br />Street and included benzene, creosote and construction adhesive as a result of the old <br />construction company and bus painting operation previously located on the site. The <br />clean up was significant and cost $3.8 million for which a hazardous substance <br />subdistrict using tax increment financing was established to pay for the clean up. There <br />are known locations of leaking fuel storage tanks within Twin Lakes, most of which have <br />been identified and received "No Action or No Association Letters" from the <br />Minnesota Pollution Control Agency. Under the terms of these letters existing uses on <br />the site (e.g. truck terminals) can remain with the contamination in place and no further <br />remediation will be mandated. However, once redevelopment occurs, a new standard of <br />clean up will be required based upon the future use. For example, housing requires a <br />higher level of clean up than commercial uses. For this reason, the existing property <br />owners are not responsible for the costs of cleanup. This is the responsibility of the new <br />development (Refer to letter from MNPCA associated with the legal requirements for <br />contamination cleanup). The City has completed additional soil and ground water testing <br />in Twin Lakes using $350,000 in US EPA funding. The limited soil testing indicated <br />mostly petroleum contamination. The ground water testing did reveal one location within <br />the Phase 1 area where hazardous contamination (TCE) was present at the deep (45 feet) <br />ground water level. Because all habitable structures in Roseville use the centralized <br />water system and water from the St. Paul Water Authority, this does not pose any <br />eminent danger but will need to be more fully investigated prior to redevelopment. <br />8.0 DESIGN STANDARDS AND GUIDELINES: <br />8.1 Twin Lakes redevelopment is subject to Section ] O l 0 of the City Code relating to Design <br />Standards. Additional Design Guidelines will be used as a guide to supplement the City <br />Code requirements under Section 1010. Those include the original design guidelines <br />prepared in 1988 and revised in 1996, as well as the design manual prepared in 2002. <br />PF3790_RPCA_GeneralConcept_110106 Page 12 of 14 <br />