My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
pf_03796
Roseville
>
Planning Files
>
Old Numbering System (pre-2007)
>
PF3000 - PF3801
>
3700
>
pf_03796
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/28/2014 1:09:05 PM
Creation date
7/8/2013 10:36:37 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Planning Files
Planning Files - Planning File #
3796
Planning Files - Type
Division of Land
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
16
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
FINDING OF FACT DENYING MINOR SUBDIVISION <br />OF 156 WOODLYNN AVENUE (PF 3796) <br />City Code provision Section 1104.04E requires that any proposed parcels in a minor <br />subdivision not cause any portion of the existing lots, parcels, or existing buildings to be in <br />violation of this regulation or the zoning code. <br />2. Section 1103.06F of the city code states that sidelines of lots shall be "substantially at right <br />angles or radial to the street line." <br />3. The proposed subdivision does not meet the requirements of Section 1103.06F in that one of <br />the sidelines of the proposed lot is not at substantially right angles or radial to the street line. <br />4. The city of Roseville has as adopted an interim ordinance that effectively places a <br />moratorium on single-family residential lot splits. One of the purposes of the interim <br />ordinance is to conduct a study regarding the appropriate size and shape of allowable <br />subdivided lots, and to determine the impact of subdivision and the shapes and size of newly <br />subdivided lots on the character of existing neighborhoods. In light of these purposes, <br />approving the purposed subdivision's irregular lot shape, and resulting lots smaller than those <br />within the immediate adjacent vicinity, would be inconsistent with the purpose of the interim <br />ordinance, and may adversely impact public health, safety, and welfare. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.