My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
CC_Minutes_2013_0617
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
201x
>
2013
>
CC_Minutes_2013_0617
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/16/2013 10:12:53 AM
Creation date
7/16/2013 10:04:29 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Minutes
Meeting Date
6/17/2013
Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
44
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Regular City Council Meeting <br /> Monday,June 17, 2013 <br /> Page 17 <br /> that it was to increase participation rates; but not allowing for any analysis of how <br /> it related to recycling rates. <br /> Mayor Roe advised that the City had been provided some data. <br /> Councilmember McGehee questioned how to evaluate how much of the current <br /> 80% of materials collected was actually recycled and if and how that could <br /> change with single sort. Councilmember McGehee questioned if forcing revenue <br /> sharing was the only way to know what happened to the materials. Councilmem- <br /> ber McGehee questioned if any communities were doing dual sort with carts; and <br /> reiterated her concerns, if the decision was to move to single sort, that the materi- <br /> als were actually recycled, and didn't simply become glorified garbage. <br /> Member DeBenedet advised that the PWETC had been told by staff that some <br /> vendors considered the final market for materials as proprietary information. <br /> Member DeBenedet advised that therefore, the RFP had been drafted that this was <br /> a requirement of the City of Roseville, and if they were not willing to provide it, <br /> they would not be considered as a vendor. Member DeBenedet opined that the <br /> PWETC thought it was a right of the City to be informed of that information. In <br /> response to Councilmember Willmus questioning if the information was actually <br /> proprietary, Member DeBenedet opined that the proof would surface in the bid if <br /> the RFP demands the information. <br /> Mayor Roe refocused the discussion to organized collection; and providing a re- <br /> sponse to the PWETC. <br /> Councilmember Willmus advised that he was still at the same point he was almost <br /> one year ago; opining that it largely depended on how such a program was admin- <br /> istered; and he wasn't sure he was quite there to know how that would happen, <br /> and remained still up in the air. In response to Councilmember McGehee's sug- <br /> gestion to provide segments of the community for each vendor, Councilmember <br /> Willmus opined that such a program would lose one of the key aspects to switch <br /> to organized collection: economies of scale. Without having one vendor for the <br /> entire community, Councilmember Willmus opined that it was difficult to put a <br /> tangible figure on the wear and tear on streets, which he intuitively thought was <br /> part of the equation. <br /> Member DeBenedet advised that, if the City Council provided a response to the <br /> PWEC's recommendations outlined in their resolution last year, indicating that <br /> they were willing to pursue organized waste collection, the PWEC would then re- <br /> spond to any and all specific issues identified by the City Council. Member <br /> DeBenedet opined that this would be the best way to proceed, after receiving the <br /> City Council's feedback, otherwise the PEWTC could really do nothing else until <br /> the City Council took that step and responded to the PWETC recommendation. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.