My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
pf09-011
Roseville
>
Planning Files
>
2009
>
pf09-011
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/29/2014 9:12:18 AM
Creation date
7/17/2013 9:07:52 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Planning Files
Planning Files - Planning File #
09-011
Planning Files - Type
Conditional Use Permit
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
62
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
� -�- <br />65 f. Compatility with the City's Comprehensive Plan. <br />66 6.2 Impact on traffic: Because Pawn America proposes to expand into an adjacent tenant <br />6� space in an existing shopping center, Planning Division has determined that the use <br />68 would have no more impact on traffic than other permitted uses that could occupy the <br />s� same space. <br />�0 6.3 Impact on parks, streets and other public facilities: The proposal represents a retail <br />i� use in an existing retail space, and so would not have additional impacts on parks, streets, <br />�2 and other public facilities. <br />i 3 6.4 Compatibility ... with contiguous properties: No changes are proposed to the site plan, <br />�4 internal traffic circulation, or landscaping, and the proposed internal structural <br />i�� modifications would not affect the site's compatibility with contiguous properties. <br />�h <br />i� <br />i� <br />� �, <br />8G <br />�� <br />82 <br />HJ <br />�� <br />�5 <br />86 <br />8i <br />88 <br />��, <br />o� <br />o� <br />�z <br />93 <br />g� <br />6.5 Impact of the use on the market value of contiguous properties: People tend to have <br />negative feelings about pawn stores and their perceived effect on residential property <br />values, but when a property is assigned Zoning and Comprehensive Plan land use <br />designations, careful consideration is given to protecting the value of surrounding <br />properties. In light of this, and because a pawn store is among the uses that are allowed <br />(conditionally or otherwise) in the B-3 District and is consistent with the "business" <br />designation of the Comprehensive Plan, the Planning Division has determined that the <br />expanded pawn store use will not affect the market value of contiguous properties. <br />6.6 Impact on the general public health, safety, and welfare: Police Department staff has <br />indicated that pawn shops are no more likely to have illegal activity or police calls than a <br />general retail business and that Roseville police enjoy a very cooperative relationship <br />with the existing Pawn America store; the Planning Division therefore believes that the <br />proposed expansion of the existing store will have no discernable impact on the general <br />public health, safety, and welfare. City licensing requirements for pawn shops are also <br />geared toward protecting the health, safety, and welfare of Roseville's residents, and if <br />Pawn America fails to satisfy those requirements, the company risks revocation of its <br />license. Even if Pawn America operates in compliance with its license but the use is later <br />determined to have a negative impact on the general public health, safety, and welfare, <br />the CoN�►T[oNAt, usE approval can be invalidated. <br />�5 6.7 Compatility with the City's Comprehensive Plan: A pawn store is a conditionally <br />gc permitted use in the B-3 General Business District and is compatible with the <br />� i Comprehensive Plan land use designation of Business. <br />8is 7.0 PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION <br />�� 7.1 On May 6, 2009, the Roseville Planning Commission held the duly noticed public <br />�oo hearing regarding the Pawn America request. At the hearing no citizens were present <br />�o�, to address the Commission, however that applicant was present to answer questions <br />�02 and provide additional clarification regarding the request. <br />�03 7.2 The Commission was unclear (as was the Planning Staf� on the condition for <br />70� surveillance of the parking lot and whether or to what extent the existing cameras <br />� 05 would suffice. They requested staff clarify prior to Council approval. <br />i o� 7.3 The Commission was also concerned with the site adding a drive-thru window <br />� c� without amending the approval Conditional Use so that included this as a condition. <br />PF09-011 RCA 051809.doc <br />Page 3 of 4 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.