Laserfiche WebLink
� <br />--. <br />proposed church use, as is also pointed out in the applicant's narrative; because these <br />uses seem to be inappropriate in Regional Business, Office, and Industrial areas of the <br />city, they will have to be reevaluated in during the current zoning update process to <br />ensure that the new zoning code contributes to achieving the goals of Roseville's <br />Comprehensive Plan. <br />6.5 Another important fact to take into consideration is that contemporary churches can be <br />dramatically different from conventional churches or religious institutions that are <br />located within residential neighborhoods, among the homes of their members, and that <br />have a few worship services over the weekend in addition to weekly educational <br />activities and occasional community events. This difference between traditional and <br />contemporary churches would seem to be due in no small part to the fact that residential <br />areas are not so culturally, ethnically, or religiously homogeneous as they once were; <br />people today choose where they'll live for different reasons than in the past and, <br />consequently, faith communities have become more geographically dispersed. In addition <br />to the simple fact that modern religious institutions have greater traffic impacts than they <br />used to because few members live close enough to walk to services or other events, some <br />contemporary churches offer their congregations many more religious, cultural, <br />educational, and community activities than their traditional counterparts. <br />6.6 The purpose of the preceding paragraph is to help explain the fact that a church, like the <br />one T4C is proposing, might no longer be appropriate in the middle of a residential <br />neighborhood. Whereas church properties have traditionally been regulated by the same <br />single-family zoning requirements and have fallen into the same residential category of <br />the Comprehensive Land Use Plan as their residential neighbors, Roseville's current <br />Comprehensive Plan guides church properties for Institutional land uses. Moreover, <br />Planning Division staff expects to create a new institutional zoning district during the <br />current zoning update process to better regulate churches, temples, schools, and so on <br />because the conventional R-1 Single-Family District has not adequately addressed the <br />unique requirements of institutional uses. <br />6.7 Through reviewing the Comprehensive Plan's descriptions of land use designations, <br />Planning Division staff has concluded that a church or other religious or secular <br />institution is appropriate on land guided specifically for Institutional uses and within the <br />Community Mixed Use area (which also explicitly allows institutional uses, among <br />others). Areas guided for high-density residential uses might also be appropriate locations <br />for institutional land uses because such areas tend to be located near major roadways <br />instead of within single-family neighborhoods, but the current description of the High- <br />Density Residential land use category doesn't address institutional uses and, if such a <br />proposal were submitted, the City would have to carefully weigh it against Roseville's <br />goals of increased residential density and choice of housing types. <br />%.O PUBLIC HEARING <br />7.1 The duly-noticed public hearing for this application was held by the Planning <br />Commission on March 3, 2010; aside from representatives of the T4C congregation, no <br />members of the public commented during the public hearing and no communications <br />have been received by staff pertaining to the application. After discussing the application <br />and reviewing the analysis provided by staff, the Planning Commission voted <br />PF10-006 RCA 032210 (2).doc <br />Page 3 of 5 <br />