Laserfiche WebLink
�i 6.0 <br />�2 6.1 <br />73 <br />74 <br />75 <br />�s <br />�� <br />78 <br />79 <br />�o <br />�31 <br />�2 fi.2 <br />83 <br />THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AND LAND USE <br />The descriptions of the land use designations in the Comprehensive Plan are included <br />with this staff report as Attachment D. Churches, like all other uses identified as <br />institutional land uses, are explicitly allowed in areas guided for Institutional uses and, by <br />more implicit reference, in Community Mixed Use areas. While many other land use <br />designations promote rather broad mixes of uses, all of the other land use designations <br />are silent on the topic of institutional land uses. That is, none of the other designations <br />explicitly or implicitly allows institutional land uses; this omission, whether accidental or <br />intentional, contributed significantly to the determination by Planning Division staff that <br />institutional uses like churches were inappropriate in areas guided by the Comprehensive <br />Plan for Regional Business land uses. <br />Several Councilmembers maintained, however, that churches were not intentionally <br />excluded from other land use designations, including Regional Business. If the City <br />84 Council determines that all land use designations are meant to allow institutional uses <br />$5 even though the final definitions of most of them fail to include institutional land uses, <br />$s then perhaps a Comprehensive Plan amendment is not necessary for approving the <br />87 proposed ZONING TEXT AMENDMENT. <br />88 <br />89 <br />90 <br />91 <br />92 <br />93 <br />94 <br />95 <br />96 <br />97 <br />98 <br />7.O THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AND AMENDMENTS <br />If institutional uses are, in fact, excluded from everywhere except the Community Mixed <br />Use and Institutional areas, the only way to allow institutional uses in more areas is to <br />amend the Comprehensive Plan. The process to amend the Comprehensive Plan would <br />require the City to hold an open house meeting, a public hearing held by the Planning <br />Commission, and subsequent action by the City Council. Given the application <br />submission requirements (even if Roseville is the applicant) and schedule of City <br />meetings, the process could not take less than 45 days. More realistically, the timeline is <br />apt to be closer to 60 days but, if begun promptly, the Comprehensive Plan Amendment <br />process could be completed by the extended deadline for action on the current zoN�tv� <br />TEXT AMENDMENT application. <br />99 H.O RECOMMENDATIONS AND SUGGESTED ACTIONS <br />100 <br />1U1 <br />102 <br />103 <br />104 <br />105 <br />106 <br />io� <br />8.1 Give due consideration to the guidance of the Comprehensive Land Use Plan, based on <br />the comments in Sections 5-7 of this report, and determine that Institutional uses are not <br />appropriate in areas guided for Regional Business land uses. In this case, Planning <br />Division staff suggests passing a motion to deny the proposed zolv[1vG TExT <br />AMENDMENT for Twin City Chinese Christian Church to allow churches in the General <br />Business District. <br />or <br />: <br />109 � � <br />�- <br />110 � � <br />111 <br />112 <br />113 or <br />Give due consideration to the guidance of the Comprehensive Land Use Plan, based on <br />the comments in Sections 5-7 of this report, and determine that Institutional uses are <br />appropriate in areas guided for Regional Business land uses, but that the Comprehensive <br />Plan must first be amended to allow such uses. In this case, Planning Division staff <br />suggests determining which land use categories ought to include institutional uses <br />and directing staff to initiate the COMPREHENSrvE PLAN AMENDMENT process. <br />PF10-006 RCA_032910 (3).doc <br />Page 4 of 5 ^ <br />� <br />