Laserfiche WebLink
Page 6 of I 1 <br />—• — <br />religious institution I have to say. In fact, I never imagined that I would ever feel so personally <br />dismayed about my church neighbor. <br />Below you will see the copies of the email that were previously sent. These should provide <br />you, and the governing body, with the necessary understanding of the issue/dispute so far. <br />I would only add that having further opportunity to examine the plans; that Bryan Lloyd at the <br />city was kind enough to provide me (see attached); that the very fact that the church is <br />planning a sign to advertise the "community garden," and its 26 plots for rent, indeed make the <br />"garden" venture an enterprise to grow produce for public consumption, and is yet an <br />additional "occupation" of the church in an R1 district that is not confined to the dwelling. (See <br />Ord. § 1004.01(G)(2)(a))(see attached). I look forward to hearing from you. <br />With Respect, <br />Larry Leiendecker (your neighbor) <br />From: Larrv Leiendecker. J.D. <br />Sent: Thursday, April 15, 2010 1:19 PM <br />To: DavidM(�northcomochurch.orq ; ncpc(a�northcomochurch.orq <br />Subject: Fw: North Como community garden <br />Dear Pastor Dave: <br />Below is an email sent to Kim Spear yesterday regarding the church's plans. As you are <br />mentioned in it, and it concerns the church, its only fair that you see what is said and what is <br />being done (and not done) in the church's name. <br />With Respect, <br />Larry Leiendecker (your neighbor). <br />From: Larry Leiendecker, J.D. <br />Sent: Wednesday, April 14, 2010 11:45 PM <br />To: Spear, Kimberley M. <br />Cc: bryan.ilovd@ci.roseville.mn.us ; qat.trudgeonC�ci.roseville.mn.us ; <br />thomas. paschke@ci. roseville. mn. us <br />Subject: Re: North Como community garden <br />Dear Kim: <br />This is in reply to the email I received from you today. I hope that you don't mind me <br />communicating with you directly. I think that you'll agree that this seems to be the better <br />approach than standing in the middle of the street or having Bryan Lloyd being the <br />intermediary. (I have copied him and others at the city on this email to keep them in the loop <br />as I suspect that they are still quite interested in the situation and would be interested in the <br />comments regarding the city planning department) <br />First off, I need to convey that while I am a lawyer, I do not represent anyone, but myself, with <br />regard to the "garden" issue. Nor could I represent anyone due to the inherent conflict of <br />4/19/2010 <br />