pf10-017 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

> > The only additional specific comments I would make based on further > review of the plan are: 1) five of the trees in the "orchard" are shown > in the public right-of-way and would need the specific approval of > Roseville's Public Works Department; and 2) installation of the proposed > sign at the southern side of the community garden could only be allowed > through approval of a Master Sign Plan which addresses all signage >(existing and future) on a properly like this. > > More generally, I would encourage Church representatives to continue to > engage neighbors of the property, both in Roseville and St. Paul, in an > attempt to address their concerns with respect to the project. The City > Code and Comprehensive Plan both make references which assume the > presence of gardens, although neither document clearly defines or > regulates gardens. Nevertheless, Planning Division staff believes that > personal and "community" gardens are consistent with the community goals > established in the Comprehensive Plan and intends to propose ordinances > in the updated zoning code which better define and regulate such uses; > while no language pertaining to gardens has yet been drafted, the > proposed "community garden" seems to be in line with what we would > expect the forthcoming ordinances to allow. > > Bryan Lloyd > Associate City Planner > City of Roseville > 651-792-7073 > bryan.11oyd@ci.roseville.mn.us > > •-� -� Page 11 of 11 4/ 19/2010