Laserfiche WebLink
-►. <br />� 70 originally a cornfield six years ago and the land was converted to the community gardens <br />� �^ around three years ago. He said one of the things he does not like about the growing <br />�%1 season is that a satellite has to be provided. NCPC did not mention a plan for bathroom <br />� i 3 facilities. One of the key differences between this location and the North Como plan is <br />��� that the NCPC gardens is surrounded by a residential neighborhood. <br />��F My husband and i feel NCPC's community garden will be an eyesore. We also agree <br />��6 with the points that were outlined in the appeal that was recently filed with the city. <br />177 Sincerely, <br />��� Dot & Jim Ashley <br />� � g P.S. We also visited the Battle Creek Community Garden which is located on a Ramsey <br />��o County compost site. In our opinion, it was really ugly! <br />� � � Petition Signers <br />� a2 Thu 5/6/2010 3:26 PM <br />��� From: Larry Leiendecker, J.D. <br />� �4 To: Bryan Lloyd <br />� �� Hi, Larry. <br />� aFS We're preparing the brief letter to send to you, the church, and the community members <br />�&� identified with your appeal letter. Would you mind sending me the digital version of that table of <br />��� names and addresses? Perhaps we don't have to spend the time retyping them since you've <br />� �� already done it. <br />� �c Thanks. <br />19 � Bryan Lloyd <br />��2 Re: PetiNon Signers Plus- more for the appeal <br />� y3 Thu 5/6/2010 4:23 PM <br />��� From: Larry Leiendecker, J.D. <br />� 5� To: Bryan Lloyd <br />196 cc: Bill Malinen <br />� Q� Dear Bryan: <br />��� Glad to help. Attached is the list. Please note that there are a few extra signatures to add. (see <br />���� attached PDF) If you could, please add this signature page to the appeal document for the <br />2oc city council. <br />2c� Also, on another matter, I was doing some thinking about what you and I discussed <br />202 yesterday. You mentioned the scenario of 75 persons with tweezers grooming the church <br />2c3 lawn etc. I remember responding that it would probably not be acceptable because it is <br />20� substantially an outdoor activity etc. I think that I may have gotten too hung up on the <br />20: potential nuisance aspect of the analogy. <br />20� On further thought, I think that such an instance happening regularly would be fine (albeit it <br />20� would likely last all of 5 minutes). My thinking is that grooming and landscaping type <br />2c� activities is something that is anticipated in a residential area or on residential land. So, yes - <br />2: � even if I had friends over for a lawn mowing "experience" (I don't have 75 though) it should <br />�' o be fine so long as it doesn't create a nuisance to my neighbors etc. But, this activity or land <br />2^�� use is much different than cultivating produce far public consumption. <br />