My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
pf10-017
Roseville
>
Planning Files
>
2010
>
pf10-017
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/29/2014 1:19:06 PM
Creation date
7/17/2013 9:28:49 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Planning Files
Planning Files - Planning File #
10-017
Planning Files - Type
Planning-Other
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
128
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
i�� a. <br />1 II£3 <br />189 b. <br />190 <br />� <br />�-. <br />A community garden which is not organized by the City may be viewed as a <br />quasi-public activity, although the church sponsor is a private organization. <br />Area requirements: The proposal includes about 25 proposed gardening plots in <br />roughly 9,000 square feet, which is a little larger than 5% of the overall property. <br />19 i Traffic generation: Assuming that everyone would drive the site, one could <br />� 92 expect vehicles corresponding to all 25 plots to converge on the property at the <br />193 same time only on rare occasions. The rest of the growing season would likely see <br />194 each of those 25 vehicles at the site more sporadically, perhaps once or twice each <br />19s week, when the individual gardeners are able to make time to tend their respective <br />196 plots. <br />� s� Parking requirements: Parking spaces would not be required to accommodate <br />198 such a low level of traffic. This is not unlike some City parks with playground <br />��9 equipment, picnic tables, walking trails, and other recreational space; all of these <br />20o features draw people to the park, but no parking spaces are required or provided. <br />20 ; Users of such a park either walk or park on the street, but the church has a parking <br />202 lot which could accommodate some of the people driving to the property. <br />203 Hours of operation: Aside from construction activities, home occupations, and <br />20� Shopping Center districts (with grocery stores and other "24-hour" uses), the City <br />205 Code does not re�ulate hours of business, institutional, or household activities. <br />20� Nevertheless, Planning Division staff would anticipate the gardening work to be <br />20� limited to the daylight hours during the growing season. <br />20� Number of employees: A community garden as proposed is not a commercial or <br />205 business venture so it would have no employees, although one could debate <br />2�o whether the gardeners (or volunteers in another quasi-public activity elsewhere) <br />2� � are to be considered "employees" in the analysis of whether a given quasi-public <br />2 � 2 use qualifies as moderate or low impact. <br />2� � Light or noise generated: Any lights that may be installed would be subject to <br />2�a pertinent City Code regulations. And aside from occasional rototiller use and the <br />2� F potential for children playing and gardeners conversing from their plots several <br />2�6 yards apart, a community garden should not be expected to generate excessive <br />2 �� levels of noise. <br />218 <br />219 <br />22C <br />22' <br />222 <br />223 <br />224 <br />225 <br />226 <br />227 <br />228 <br />229 <br />c. The participation guidelines for an existing 120-plot community garden at Oasis <br />Park indicate that gardeners should park in the nearby parking lot. The paved <br />parking area is about 60 feet wide by 150 feet deep; according to the standard <br />requirements for parking areas, this would allow for 30 parking spaces. If this <br />ratio of 1 parking space for every 4 plots is applied as a parking "requirement", <br />the proposed community garden would need about 7 parking spaces. <br />d. Although a nominal fee would be collected in connection with the garden plots, <br />the fee would help to cover the costs of equipment, water use, and so on. The <br />plot-reservation fees would not constitute a meaningful revenue stream for the <br />church, nor is the produce intended for commercial or business purposes. For this <br />reason, Planning Division staff does not anticipate any retailing, wholesaling, or <br />warehousing activities connected to the proposed community garden. <br />Appeal_RCA_052410 <br />Page 5 of 7 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.