pf10-024 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

� happy to have you come by the space for a tour and guide of what will be happening on a normal day at the daycare. Additionally, we plan to set-up a tour of another dog daycare that works with a similar quantity of dogs, so that city officials may see first hand that noise, odors, etc will not be issues. I would recommend that you attend if you are able to. Please let me know if you have any further questions. Thanks and have a wonderful day! Kristen On 7hu, 14 Oct 2010 20:16:43 -0500, Molly and Steve <msring@earthlink.net> wrote: > Hi Kristen, > I was copied your response to Lynn's concerns, and you did address > some of mine. > > I would appreciate more information regarding the sanitation issues > outdoors. There are some other unclear items regarding the land use, > as well. > > 1. I note that surfaces proposed are astroturf and some sort of pebbles. > The realities of trying to clean up sticky dog feces make me quite > doubtful that these surfaces could be satisfactorily cleaned. (If they > can be--how?) More info would be appreciated. > > 2. If high pressure hoses were going to be used for sanitation, where > does the contaminated water go? > --Directly into the storm sewer? >--Is the drain size adequate for high volumes of feces-polluted water? >--Is there more than one drain? > > 3. How will other waste be contained between scheduled pick-ups? > > 4. I note that Roseville Codes, Ch1007.01A4 discusses a 40-foot strip > between the back boundary and the residential area that is to be > landscaped, and not to be used for parking. Is part of the Conditional > Use Permit to allow the play yard closer than this 40-foot zone? > > 5. Regarding screening, our house and the Solberg house to our east > are still looking into a ridiculous gap in the privacy fence, where > the fences are 15 feet away from each other, giving us a clear and > ugly view > of the industry property. Is the City requesting that you as new > proprietors would somehow fix that that bizarre gaffe as part of the > Code Ch1007.01A4 or Code Ch 1007.01A2? > > 6. I'm not sure that the Grand Avenue Dog Days facility is a parallel > example for property value comparisons, as that Macalester-Groveland > area tends to have quite high property values throughout...my guess > would be that they are substantially higher than those in this Rose > Place neighborhood--and might be comparing apples to oranges. > Also, the Roseville Animal Hospital does not seem a helpful z