My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
pf10-024
Roseville
>
Planning Files
>
2010
>
pf10-024
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/8/2015 2:46:49 PM
Creation date
7/17/2013 9:30:16 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Planning Files
Planning Files - Planning File #
10-024
Planning Files - Type
Interim Use Permit
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
93
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Pat Trudgeon <br />From: Molly and Steve [msring@earthlink.net] <br />Sent: Thursday, October 14, 2010 8:17 PM <br />To: Kristen; Pat Trudgeon <br />Subject: Re: Woof Room <br />,. <br />Hi Kristen, <br />I was copied your response to Lynn's concerns, and you did address some of mine. <br />I would appreciate more information regarding the sanitation issues outdoors. There are some <br />other unclear items regarding the land use, as well. <br />1. I note that surfaces proposed are astroturf and some sort of pebbles. <br />7he realities of trying to clean up sticky dog feces make me quite doubtful that these <br />surfaces could be satisfactorily cleaned. (If they can be--how?) More info would be <br />appreciated. <br />2. If high pressure hoses were going to be used for sanitation, where does the contaminated <br />water go? <br />--Directly into the storm sewer? <br />--IS the drain size adequate for high volumes of feces-polluted water? <br />--Is there more than one drain? <br />3. How will other waste be contained between scheduled pick-ups? <br />4. I note that Roseville Codes, Ch1007.01A4 discusses a 40-foot strip between the back <br />boundary and the residential area that is to be landscaped, and not to be used for parking. <br />Is part of the Conditional Use Permit to allow the play yard closer than this 40-foot zone? <br />5. Regarding screening, our house and the Solberg house to our east are still looking into a <br />ridiculous gap in the privacy fence, where the fences are 15 feet away from each other, <br />giving us a clear and ugly view of the industry property. Is the City requesting that you as <br />new proprietors would somehow fix that that bizarre gaffe as part of the Code Ch1007.01A4 or <br />Code Ch 1007.01A2? <br />6. I'm not sure that the Grand Avenue Dog Days facility is a parallel example for property <br />value comparisons, as that Macalester-Groveland area tends to have quite high property values <br />throughout...my guess would be that they are substantially higher than those in this Rose <br />Place neighborhood--and might be comparing apples to oranges. <br />Also, the Roseville Animal Hospital does not seem a helpful comparison, as it is totally <br />indoors. Plus, it has a tall tree/shrub area plus a garage and parking area serving as a de <br />facto buffer area between it and the apartment building. <br />Sorry it's taken a while to get back to you. I know it's helpful for you to get as much on <br />the table as possible before the November meeting. <br />Thanks, Kristen. <br />Sincerely, <br />Molly Redmond <br />1455 Rose Place <br />On 9/30/10 8:15 PM, Kristen wrote: <br />> Hi Lynn, <br />1 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.