My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2013_0722_packet
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
2013
>
2013_0722_packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/30/2013 2:11:29 PM
Creation date
7/19/2013 9:16:01 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
292
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Attachment C <br />EM20,2013RCCM <br />XTRACT OF THE AYOSEVILLEITYOUNCIL EETING <br />13. Business Items (Action Items) <br />a. Approve Preliminary Plat of an Un-Addressed Residential parcel on Millwood <br />Avenue between Victoria and Chatsworth Streets <br />City Planner Thomas Paschke displayed a map of the project parcel, and briefly <br />summarized the request for preliminary plat approval as detailed in the RCA dated May <br />20, 2013. <br />At the request of Councilmember Willmus, Mr. Paschke advised that Outlots were not <br />construed as corner lots, and that development couldn’t occur on them. Mr. Paschke <br />advised that they were specifically created for storm water purposes and restricted <br />anything on them; and took the place of a public drainage and utility easement. Mr. <br />Paschke advised that staff would work with the City Attorney on the legalities of the <br />Outlots and their recommended creation. <br />Councilmember Willmus expressed concern, if the determination was made that they <br />were not buildable, that the City may create a double standard regarding the use of <br />Outlots. <br />Mr. Paschke confirmed that their use would be restricted, and would not create a double- <br />standard; as a home and storm water management could co-exist on the Outlots. <br />For tax purposes, Councilmember Willmus questioned how the parcels were handles; <br />with Mr. Paschke deferring to the developer; anticipating that they intended to create an <br />association to maintain the Outlots; separate from Lots 1 and 6 for tax purposes. <br />As a follow-up to Councilmember Willmus’ question, Mayor Roe observed that, since <br />corner lots needed to be a minimum of 100’, if the Outlots were included in Lots 1 and 6, <br />their size would exceed that requirement, and then an easement could be available. <br />At the request of Councilmember McGehee as to why there had been no meeting between <br />the developer and neighbors, Mr. Paschke advised that such a meeting was not a <br />requirement of existing City Code for this type for Preliminary Plat approval. Mr. <br />Paschke advised that City Code only proscribed such a meeting for Conditional Uses, <br />Rezoning, Interim Uses, and Comprehensive Plan Amendments; but that Minor <br />Subdivisions, Subdivisions, and Variance applications did not have such a requirement. <br />Councilmember McGehee advised that neither she nor staff had been able to locate the <br />1997 hydrology study document referenced in written comments received from Mr. and <br />Mrs. McElroy. <br />Mr. Paschke advised that staff had further researched that document this afternoon, and <br />still could not locate any such document. <br />Since the neighbors had raised concerns on drainage in the neighborhood and specific to <br />this proposed development, Councilmember McGehee opined that it was an important <br />issue, and referenced the May 1 letter from David L. Morrill, P.E. included with the <br />McElroy written comments raising issues suggesting that the drainage as proposed was <br />substandard. Councilmember McGehee expressed her dismay that the developer had not <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.